0th dimension and other dimensions

no gun
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
hi :D
after reading up on 10 dimensions (and how more can be added any time we need them even though they might not exist) i found it interesting how it stated that 5-10 dimensions where located in the well known 3 dimensions we see every day (with the 4th dimension being time).

what i don't understand is that if these are spheres and they overlap so no gap is left between them (if a gap is left that means that these dimensions won't exist everywhere in which case maths which has built up around them will fail) then that means these spheres must overlap with our own 3 dimensions. If they overlap with our 3 dimensions wouldn't that just mean that they are our 3 dimensions and no more.

let me reword it incase it got a little confusing
we know our 3 dimensions quite well... inside our dimensions are other dimensions (spheres if u will which are made up of another 3 or so dimensions). let's say these spheres don't touch each other. does this mean that there are places where only 3 dimensions exist (not taking time into account)?

also how is there a 0th dimension?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Extra dimensions wouldn't be located "in the well known 3 dimensions we see every day". An extra dimension is by definition a direction that is independent of the others. So there wouldn't be any overlapping spheres.

If you call an extra dimension "0th" or "5th" or even "Dave", is up to you. It just a convention.
 
so that means the site
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/dimensions.html
is misleading

and there's no way to prove these dimensions other than maths rite? so eventually they can be disproven with enough calculations
 
no gun said:
so that means the site
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/dimensions.html
is misleading

and there's no way to prove these dimensions other than maths rite? so eventually they can be disproven with enough calculations


Why would this site be misleading ?

To us spacetime looks like a continuum. it is only when you probe to much smaller distance-scales that the "granular" structure of space time would become manifest. I am referring to quantized space time here but this also goes for these extra dimensions...

regards
marlon
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
799
Back
Top