Why is 10^-36 seconds considered the starting point of inflation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeebo17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Seconds
AI Thread Summary
The starting point of inflation is believed to be around 10^-36 seconds, coinciding with the end of the grand unification epoch, due to its implications for resolving key cosmological issues. If inflation occurs before grand unification symmetry breaking, it fails to address the magnetic monopole problem, while starting too late complicates baryogenesis, as necessary interactions are not available at lower energies. The timing around the GUT scale allows inflation to dilute magnetic monopoles and set the stage for baryon creation post-inflation. Additionally, specific inflationary models, such as a free inflaton field, align with observed cosmic microwave background density perturbations when the energy density is at the GUT scale. Thus, 10^-36 seconds serves as a critical threshold for both theoretical consistency and observational alignment.
zeebo17
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I've seen in many places that inflation is believed to begin around 10^{-36} s corresponding to the end of the grand unification epoch. Why do we believe that this is the time that it started? Isn't the only requirement that it start sometime after Planck time 10^{-44} s?

Thanks!
 
Space news on Phys.org
I'm not an expert on inflation, but here's my understanding.

Inflation models assume some kind of GUT (perhaps a variation of SU(5)) which is spontaneously broken around 10^15 GeV, which corresponds to 10^-36 s.

If inflation occurs before GUT symmetry breaking, it does not solve the monopole problem (we should see lots of magnetic monopoles but we don't).

If inflation occurs too late after GUT symmetry breaking, we have a problem of baryogenesis. Baryogenesis requires the availability of baryon number changing interactions, we know that there aren't any in the explored region of energies, but most GUTs allow such process near GUT scale. Problem is, inflation wipes any traces of baryogenesis that occurs before its onset, just as it scatters magnetic monopoles.

Therefore the solution is to have inflation right around the GUT scale, it spreads out magnetic monopoles sufficiently to make them virtually unobservable, and then, when inflation is over, the system experiences reheating and gets close enough to the GUT scale again to generate baryons.
 
You can also fix the energy scale on some specific inflationary models. For example, a free inflaton field V \sim \phi^2 produces density perturbations of the order of \delta \rho / \rho \sim 10^{-5} (which is what we observe from the CMB) if and only if the energy density of the field is approximately (10^{15} \mathrm{GeV})^4.
 
Only a certain period of expansion is required to flatten the universe to the present degree, so my understanding is that 10^-36 is a lower bound on the period
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top