104.5 degree triangle w/ 2 equal legs, need the 3rd leg's length

AI Thread Summary
To find the length of the third leg of a triangle with two equal legs of 96 inches and an included angle of 104.5 degrees, the Law of Cosines is applicable. The equation used is C^2 = A^2 + B^2 - 2AB*cos(θ), where A and B are the lengths of the legs, and θ is the included angle. A user initially struggled with the calculation, obtaining an incorrect result of 1.17545571 instead of the expected 1.5. It was identified that a mistake was made by omitting a minus sign in the cosine calculation. Correcting this error allowed for a better understanding of the Law of Cosines and yielded the correct length for the third leg.
CocoonOHorror
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i have a triangle with 2 legs of 96 inches. the angle between them is 104.5 degrees. how do i get the length of the 3rd leg?

Homework Equations

wish i knew.


The Attempt at a Solution


tried Cos, Sin, and Tan of 104.5 * length of a leg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a line down the centre. Now you have two right-angled triangles. It should be a piece of cake from there.
 
willem2 said:
How about the cosine rule?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_cosines

works for unequal legs as well.

when i tried this i got 1.17545571, but the answer should be 1.5.

C^2=(.96)^2+(.96)^2-2(.96)(.96)(-.25038)
 
DaveC426913 said:
Draw a line down the centre. Now you have two right-angled triangles. It should be a piece of cake from there.

thanks man! i think this worked, and i kind of understand why.

i still don't understand why the law of cosines didnt work for me, i wonder what i screwed up...
 
CocoonOHorror said:
when i tried this i got 1.17545571, but the answer should be 1.5.

C^2=(.96)^2+(.96)^2-2(.96)(.96)(-.25038)

you forgot one of the minus signs in -2(.96)(.96)(-.25038)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top