MHB 11.3 Give the matrix in standard basis

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the matrix representation of the linear transformation T defined by T(p)=(x^2+1)p''(x)-xp'(x)+2p'(x) in two different bases. For the standard basis α=(x^2,x,1), the resulting matrix is determined to be \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 2 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix}. In the second basis β={x^2+x+1,x+1,1}, the matrix representation is calculated as \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 3 & 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix}. The calculations involve applying T to each basis vector and expressing the results in terms of the respective bases. The discussion highlights the importance of clarity in mathematical explanations, noting that some resources can be overly simplistic.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
We define the application $T:P_2\rightarrow P_2$ by
$$T(p)=(x^2+1)p''(x)-xp'(x)+2p'(x)$$
1. Give the matrix $\displaystyle\left[T\right]_\infty^\infty$ in the standard basis $\alpha=(x^2,x,1)$
2 Give the matrix $\displaystyle\left[T\right]_\infty^\infty$ where $\beta=\{x^2+x+1,x+1,1\}$

would this be

$\left[\begin{array}{c}1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0\end{array}\right]$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you see that \begin{pmatrix}a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}a \\ d \\ g\end{pmatrix},
that \begin{pmatrix}a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}b \\ e \\ h\end{pmatrix},
and \begin{pmatrix}a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}c \\ f \\ i\end{pmatrix}?

That is, applying the linear transformation to the vectors in the ordered basis, in turn, gives you the columns of the matrix.

Here the linear transformation is T(p)= (x^2+ 1)p''(x)- xp'(x)+ 2p(x) (you have "2p'(x) but that looks suspicious. If that were correct why wouldn't it be "(2- x)p'(x)"?) and, in the first problem, the basis vectors are x^2,x, and 1. T(x^2)= (x^2+ 1)(2)- x(2x)+ 2x^2=x^2+ 1. That would be represented by the column matrix \begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{pmatrix} and that is the first column of the matrix. T(x)=(x^2+ 1)(0)- x(1)+ 2(x)= x which is represented by the column matrix \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 2 \\ 0\end{pmatrix} and that is the second column of the matrix. Finally, T(1)= (x^2+ 1)(0)- x(0)+ 2(1)= 2 which is represented by the column matrix \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 2\end{pmatrix} and that is the third column of the matrix. The matrix representation of T in this ordered basis is \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 2 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix}.

In the second problem the ordered basis vectors are x^2+ x+ 1, x+1. and 1. T(x^2+ x+ 1)= (x^2+ 1)(2)- x(2x+ 1)+ 2(x^2+ x+ 1)= 2x^2+ 2- 2x^2- x+ 2x^2+ 2x+ 2= 2x^2+ x+ 4. But now we have to write that in terms of this basis. That is, we need to find a, b, and c so that a(x^2+ x+ 1)+ b(x+ 1)+ c(1)= ax^2+ (a+ b)x+ (a+ b+ c)= 2x^2+ x+ 4. We have a= 2, a+ b= 2+ b= 1 so b= -1 and a+ b+ c= 2- 1+ c= 1+ c= 4 so c= 3. The first column of the matrix is \begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ -1 \\ 3 \end{pmatrix}. T(x+ 1)= (x^2+ 1)(0)- x(1)+ 2(x+ 1)= x+ 1. Well that's easy! x+ 1= 0(x^2+ x+ 1)+ 1(x+ 1)+ 0(1) so the second column of the matrix is \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}. T(1)= (x^2+ 1)(0)- x(0)+ 2(1)= 2. That can be written 2= 0(x^2+ x+ 1)+ 0(x+ 1)+ 2 which corresponds to the column matrix \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 2\end{pmatrix}. The matrix representing T in this ordered matrix is \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 3 & 0 & 2\end{pmatrix}.
 
I deeply appreciate the extended explanation
that helped quite a bit...

examples from books sometimes assume way too much

that is where MHB has filled in the best

Mahalo
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K