MHB 11.3 Give the matrix in standard basis

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
We define the application $T:P_2\rightarrow P_2$ by
$$T(p)=(x^2+1)p''(x)-xp'(x)+2p'(x)$$
1. Give the matrix $\displaystyle\left[T\right]_\infty^\infty$ in the standard basis $\alpha=(x^2,x,1)$
2 Give the matrix $\displaystyle\left[T\right]_\infty^\infty$ where $\beta=\{x^2+x+1,x+1,1\}$

would this be

$\left[\begin{array}{c}1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0\end{array}\right]$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you see that \begin{pmatrix}a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}a \\ d \\ g\end{pmatrix},
that \begin{pmatrix}a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}b \\ e \\ h\end{pmatrix},
and \begin{pmatrix}a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}c \\ f \\ i\end{pmatrix}?

That is, applying the linear transformation to the vectors in the ordered basis, in turn, gives you the columns of the matrix.

Here the linear transformation is T(p)= (x^2+ 1)p''(x)- xp'(x)+ 2p(x) (you have "2p'(x) but that looks suspicious. If that were correct why wouldn't it be "(2- x)p'(x)"?) and, in the first problem, the basis vectors are x^2,x, and 1. T(x^2)= (x^2+ 1)(2)- x(2x)+ 2x^2=x^2+ 1. That would be represented by the column matrix \begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{pmatrix} and that is the first column of the matrix. T(x)=(x^2+ 1)(0)- x(1)+ 2(x)= x which is represented by the column matrix \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 2 \\ 0\end{pmatrix} and that is the second column of the matrix. Finally, T(1)= (x^2+ 1)(0)- x(0)+ 2(1)= 2 which is represented by the column matrix \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 2\end{pmatrix} and that is the third column of the matrix. The matrix representation of T in this ordered basis is \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 2 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 2 \end{pmatrix}.

In the second problem the ordered basis vectors are x^2+ x+ 1, x+1. and 1. T(x^2+ x+ 1)= (x^2+ 1)(2)- x(2x+ 1)+ 2(x^2+ x+ 1)= 2x^2+ 2- 2x^2- x+ 2x^2+ 2x+ 2= 2x^2+ x+ 4. But now we have to write that in terms of this basis. That is, we need to find a, b, and c so that a(x^2+ x+ 1)+ b(x+ 1)+ c(1)= ax^2+ (a+ b)x+ (a+ b+ c)= 2x^2+ x+ 4. We have a= 2, a+ b= 2+ b= 1 so b= -1 and a+ b+ c= 2- 1+ c= 1+ c= 4 so c= 3. The first column of the matrix is \begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ -1 \\ 3 \end{pmatrix}. T(x+ 1)= (x^2+ 1)(0)- x(1)+ 2(x+ 1)= x+ 1. Well that's easy! x+ 1= 0(x^2+ x+ 1)+ 1(x+ 1)+ 0(1) so the second column of the matrix is \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}. T(1)= (x^2+ 1)(0)- x(0)+ 2(1)= 2. That can be written 2= 0(x^2+ x+ 1)+ 0(x+ 1)+ 2 which corresponds to the column matrix \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 2\end{pmatrix}. The matrix representing T in this ordered matrix is \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 3 & 0 & 2\end{pmatrix}.
 
I deeply appreciate the extended explanation
that helped quite a bit...

examples from books sometimes assume way too much

that is where MHB has filled in the best

Mahalo
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K