14 year old geek wants to learn physics

AI Thread Summary
Learning physics can be challenging, especially when searching for free resources. Wikipedia is recommended for grasping basic concepts, including Newton's laws and SI base units, though it lacks problem-solving exercises. Strengthening math skills, particularly in algebra, trigonometry, and calculus, is essential for understanding physics. Engaging with a physics teacher may provide additional guidance and resources. Overall, physics is viewed as a rewarding field of study worth pursuing.
yup790
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I am very interested in physics.

I have been trying to learn physics but I cannot find anything good and free to learn. It doesn't have to cover modern physics but nice if it did.

I have no problem with maths, apart from calculus but i would like to learn.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Although a bit cliche I recommend hitting up wikipedia just to get the basics of physics. Newtons laws are crucial to basic physics,so if you are even vaguely familiar with Newtons work you'll be able to handle basic physics. I would also recommend learning the SI base units. Physics is an interesting field of study and is worthwhile endeavour.
 
Also stop calling yourself a geek, because it has a very negative connotation. :)

Wikipedia is a very good source to learn basic science. The only problem is that is doesn't offer problems to solve. I don't know of any other good source that does. You can ask your physics teacher?
 
The best way to start learning physics is to work on your math skills. Be proficient at algebra, trig and calculus.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
701
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
244
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top