1d potential and switching between operators

Brewer
Messages
203
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


q1.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


As a group we're stuck on this as a result of the lecturer saying that he wouldn't help us because we should work as a group and find other ways other than asking him about it. Which is fair enough - but none of us understand what's going on!

So far I have tried substituting in for p in the middle of the bracket with -ihd/dx and then used the commutation relationship to try substituting ih for xp - px, but this seems to leave me being nowhere.

I also tried starting with the bracket having H in the middle and substituting for that - this kind of left me with a bracket with p in the middle and one with x in the middle, but whilst this kind of left things in a format that almost looked correct the two brackets were not equal to one another, only additive.

Could anyone suggest a starting point to look at or just any other helpful information that I may have missed when rereading my notes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, have you calculated [x,H]?

Then you can calculate <n|[x,H]|n'> in two different ways: equating the two answers gives you the desired result.
 
No I hadn't - I thought that was to do with the second part of the question.

I shall give that a go now!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top