1kg object and I apply a force of 1N for 1sec, It will move 1/2m

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentallic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apply Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of work in physics, particularly in relation to applying a force to a moving object versus a stationary one. Participants explore the implications of force, motion, and energy transfer, examining how these factors interact in different scenarios. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how a 1N force applied for 1 second results in a 0.5m displacement for a stationary 1kg object, suggesting confusion over the calculation of work.
  • Another participant asserts that work is a vector and emphasizes that the total work done includes contributions from both the applied force and the object's existing motion.
  • A participant clarifies their calculation of displacement using the equation s=ut+1/2at², asserting that the acceleration due to the applied force is 1 m/s².
  • There is a discussion about the nature of work being scalar, with one participant referencing a source that defines mechanical work as energy transferred by a force acting through a distance.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the vector nature of work and force.
  • Another participant distinguishes between work and power, noting that the work equation does not include a time element, while power is defined as work done per unit of time.
  • A participant discusses kinetic energy, stating that the object at 10m/s has an initial kinetic energy that changes when a force is applied, leading to a calculation of work as the change in kinetic energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of work, the role of force in motion, and the relationship between work and kinetic energy. There is no consensus on these points, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants operate under various assumptions, such as the absence of resistive forces and the definitions of work and power. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and differing interpretations of physical concepts.

Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95
I'm having trouble understanding work.

Taking an example: If I have a 1kg object and I apply a force of 1N for 1sec, It will move 1/2m and thusI will have done 1/2 (units?) of work, by the equation W=Fs.
But instead, if I consider the same object now traveling at 10m/s and apply a 1N force for 1 sec, the object will travel 10.5m in that time, so now the work done is 10.5?

I don't understand how you can do more work when all you've done is apply the same force to the same object for the same amount of time, but the only difference is that the object in the first case was stationary relative to you, while the other case it was moving. And also, if I applied the force in the direction opposing the motion, less work would have been done than if I applied it in the direction of motion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


first of all, how did you work out that the object will only move 0.5m if you apply a 1N force for 1 second to it?

Work is a vector as is force. The work is done by the force in the direction of the force. If an object is already traveling at 10 m/s, the work that you do by applying your 1N for 1 second is the same as in the first example. The force that is causing the object to travel at 10m/s is also doing work of it's own. The work of both together is the total work. Work is just energy and is expressed in Joules [J] usually as this is the SI unit or work and energy.

What's really going to blow your mind is that if you push the object one direction with 1N for 1 second and then push it in the opposite direction with 1N for 1sec and it returns to it's original position, you've done no work. That's the beauty of vectors.
 


redargon said:
first of all, how did you work out that the object will only move 0.5m if you apply a 1N force for 1 second to it?
By using [itex]s=ut+1/2at^2[/itex]
[itex]a=F/m[/itex] so therefore a=1 and t=1, u=0.

redargon said:
The force that is causing the object to travel at 10m/s is also doing work of it's own.
But there is no force required for the object to move at 10m/s. I'm assuming a non-resistive environment so it will continue at it's usual velocity.
 


redargon said:
Work is a vector as is force.
What? From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_(physics ) :
mechanical work is the amount of energy transferred by a force acting through a distance. Like energy, it is a scalar quantity,
 
Last edited by a moderator:


:redface: indeed, my bad.
 


I think that you are confusing work and power, in the equation for work (force X distance moved) there is no time element, power is work done per unit of time.
 


Mentallic said:
But there is no force required for the object to move at 10m/s. I'm assuming a non-resistive environment so it will continue at it's usual velocity.

So the object will have an initital kinetic energy of 1/2mv², so (1/2(m)(10)²) and then you will be increasing that kinetic energy to 1/2m(10.5)² by adding your force in the same direction of the motion and work is the change in kinetic energy. So, W = E2-E1 or 1/2m(10.5²-10²)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K