I 1s orbital overlaps with the nucleus, why don't they interact?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter rumborak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nucleus Orbital
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interaction between a hydrogen atom's 1s orbital electron and its nucleus, highlighting that while there is significant overlap, the nucleus is often treated as a dimensionless point charge. Although electron capture is a form of interaction where the nucleus absorbs an electron, it is not energetically favorable in hydrogen due to mass constraints. The conversation also notes that the finite size of the nucleus affects energy levels and can break degeneracy in quantum states. The radial probability distribution indicates that the highest probability for the 1s electron is not at the nucleus, which complicates the concept of direct interactions. Overall, the interactions between the electron and nucleus are complex and influenced by various factors beyond simple overlap.
rumborak
Messages
706
Reaction score
154
Granted, the size difference between a hydrogen atom's electron cloud and its nucleus is a factor of one million (~1Å vs ~10^-6Å), but that's still a significant amount of overlap that, I would think, would trigger the occasional interaction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They do interact, in most considerations indeed the nucleus is treated merely as a point and hence dimensionless charge. But if more accurate energy levels are desired, various corrections, usually treated as perturbations, must be incorporated into the Schroedinger equation. The one that pertains the finite size of the nucleus is the volume effect.
 
Indeed they do. Electron capture is a type of radioactive decay where the nucleus absorbs an inner shell electron. This doesn't happen in hydrogen because it isn't energetically favorable; the resulting neutron has more mass than the hydrogen atom.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Radioactive isotopes that decay by pure electron capture can be inhibited from radioactive decay if they are fully ionized ("stripped" is sometimes used to describe such ions). It is hypothesized that such elements, if formed by the r-process in exploding supernovae, are ejected fully ionized and so do not undergo radioactive decay as long as they do not encounter electrons in outer space.

That. Is. So. Cool.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
But if more accurate energy levels are desired

To expand on this, the effect also changes the number of energy levels for the hydrogen atom, not just their value. There is the well-known k-l degeneracy, where the n=2 l=0 level has the same energy as the n=2 l=1 level. But because the l = 0 level spends more time "inside" the nucleus, it has a larger energy shift than the l=1 state, breaking the degeneracy.
 
phyzguy said:
Indeed they do. Electron capture is a type of radioactive decay where the nucleus absorbs an inner shell electron.

cool, learn something new every day :)
 
If you, like I, have a stack of "Scientific American" gathering dust on your shelves, you might find it interesting to read or re-read this article: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-proton-radius-puzzle/

As I recall, part of it talks about how the electron wave function overlaps the proton wave function differently than the muon does in muonic hydrogen. It is offered up as a possible explanation of why the proton radius appears to be different when muons are substituted for electrons in one method for measuring the the proton radius.
 
You probably mean react , not interact.
The hydrogen atom is produced by electron-proton interaction.
 
I would think the previous discussion in this thread indicates that I was indeed talking about interaction between the electron's wave function and the proton's, not just a chemistry consideration. I was wondering why, if the the highest probability of an 1s electron is smack in the middle of the nucleus, why there aren't obvious interactions between the two. As was indicated in the replies here, there are indeed interactions resulting from that.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #10
rumborak said:
the the highest probability of an 1s electron is smack in the middle of the nucleus
It seems like you forget that the radial probability of a hydrogen-like atom is given by ##r^2|\psi_{nl}(r)|^2##, the presence of ##r^2## makes the probability inevitably zero in the origin and the maximum is shifted to a further distance.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu and davenn
  • #11
rumborak said:
Granted, the size difference between a hydrogen atom's electron cloud and its nucleus is a factor of one million (~1Å vs ~10^-6Å), but that's still a significant amount of overlap that, I would think, would trigger the occasional interaction.

I don't understand what you mean by an interaction. The way I look at it the interaction between the electron and the nucleus is what forms the 1s orbital, so as long as that orbital exists there's an interaction at all times.

On the other hand, if by interaction you mean "occupy the same place at the same time" then you are asking a question that can't be answered because the electron can't be located that precisely.

But on the other hand if you're asking if there are other interactions besides the electromagnetic interaction that forms the 1s orbital, then the answer is yes and other posters have provided that answer.
 
  • #12
Back
Top