1st order, 2nd order Rate reactions HELP

AI Thread Summary
Understanding reaction orders is crucial for grasping how reactant concentrations affect reaction rates. A first-order reaction has a rate that is directly proportional to the concentration of one reactant, while a second-order reaction can either depend on the square of one reactant's concentration or the product of two reactants' concentrations. Zero-order reactions have rates that remain constant regardless of reactant concentrations. The overall order of a reaction is the sum of the individual orders, which can be determined through experimental data. This foundational knowledge is essential for analyzing chemical kinetics effectively.
brandon1
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
1st order, 2nd order Rate reactions HELP!

I have read the section of my book over and over and studied the practice problems, but I still do not understand 1st order, 2nd order, or 0 order rate reactions. What does it mean to be of any particular order?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what are you talking about?

what lesson are you reading?

you information is incomplete, I'm sorry... that's why i cannot understand the order that you're referring to...
 
the order is just the relationship between the molarity of a reactant and the amount that it affects the rate of the reaction.
 
oh! so that's what brandon meant... lol! i didn't get it first...
 
If the rate of a reaction is given by :

rate= dP/dt = k*[A]^a \cdot <b>^b \cdot [C]^c \dots </b>

then the order of the reaction is said to be a+b+c+...

So, a first order reaction has a rate that is linearly proportional to the concentration of one of the reactants. A second order reaction can be one of the two following kinds :

rate = k*[A]^2
or
rate = k*[A]

A zero order reaction has a rate that is independent of the concentration of any of the reactants.
 
Let's say you have the following data:

A + B ---> C

[A]-----------reaction rate
.010----.020-----.050
.020----.020-----.100
.020----.040-----.400

Look at the first and second lines; [A] increases by a factor of 2 as does the reaction rate ( is held constant). 2^x = 2? x = 1, so [A] is a first order reactant. Now look at lines 2 and 3; [A] is held constant, increases by a factor of 2, and the reaction rate increases by a factor of 4. 2^x = 4? x = 2, so is a second order reactant.

Now you right the differential rate law like this: rate = k[A]^2. The overall order of the reaction is 3.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top