2 frequencies within an interference pattern

AI Thread Summary
Two sources transmitting different frequencies can create an interference pattern, but the resulting pattern may be complex and difficult to interpret. The effectiveness of the interference depends on the proximity of the frequencies and the receiver's ability to distinguish them. A monochromatic light source is preferred for clear interference patterns, as it captures minute changes in light. A suggested method for visualizing this involves using Excel to simulate the interference by summing sine waves of the two frequencies. Ultimately, the clarity of the interference pattern is influenced by the frequency relationship and the quality of the receiving equipment.
lektor
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Hi, short question.

What would be the effect of 2 sources both transmitting 2 different frequencies if placed in a way that forms an interference pattern.

ie. 2 aerials places parallel X meters apart transmitting in the same direction at 2 different frequencies per aerial.


Sorry if i didn't articulate this idea to well :<
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would imagine that it would have no pattern or rather the pattern would be incomprehensible, useless. The main reason that for a monochromatic light is so that all of the miniscule changes and alterations in the light will be reflected in light going out of both slits. You should read up in your physics text, the beginning of the interferences chapter should explain these "miniscule" differences in more detail.
 
You could do a poor quality simulation in Microsoft Excel that would at least give you the point.

Try this

Cell B1: (freq 1)
Cell C1: (freq 2)

A3: =1/(b1*10)
B3: =2pi()*b1
C3: =2pi()*c1

A5: 0
B5: =2*PI()/B1
C5: =2*PI()/C1
E5: =B5+C5

A6: =A5+$A$3
B6: =SIN((A6/$B$3)*2*PI())
C6: =SIN((A6/$C$3)*2*PI())
E6: =B6+C6

Copy Row 6 and paste into about the next 100 rows.

Chart A5 thru Column E of the last row you pasted.

You change the values in Cell B1 and C1 to change the frequencies of the two signals.
Column E is the sum of the two signals.

Mixing the signals obviously has an effect. Trying different frequencies, you visually see whether or not the pattern of the original signals are discernable or not. (since the number of cycles displayed is dependent on the first frequency, it's better if that's the lower frequency).

I'm not sure what the intent of your question is, at least in the context of whatever course you're taking, but in reality, whether or not the two signals 'interfere' with each other depends how close they are too each other and the receivers ability to discriminate the 'proper' frequency from the other.
 
GeneralChemTutor said:
I would imagine that it would have no pattern or rather the pattern would be incomprehensible, useless. The main reason that for a monochromatic light is so that all of the miniscule changes and alterations in the light will be reflected in light going out of both slits. You should read up in your physics text, the beginning of the interferences chapter should explain these "miniscule" differences in more detail.


Im not sure if i phased my question correctly, sorry for the inconvenience.

I talked to my Physics teacher about it today and it seems that we haven't covered it yet, but he cleared it up for me :).

Btw, what type of chart should i use to for that? I am interested to see how well this works :D
 
lektor said:
Im not sure if i phased my question correctly, sorry for the inconvenience.

I talked to my Physics teacher about it today and it seems that we haven't covered it yet, but he cleared it up for me :).

Btw, what type of chart should i use to for that? I am interested to see how well this works :D
You click on the chart icon and select a line chart, preferably without a bunch of boxes or x's for the data points. You'll see each original signal plus the sum of the signals.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top