Multiple Particles in a Box: How Does the Schrodinger Equation Change?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Particles
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
The Schrodinger equation is for 1 particle in a system? If so what happens if there are two or more in a system such as a box?

Would you use two SEs or one with the mass as the combined mass of the particles. Or something else? I have a feeling the latter is the case as the two particles could be very different in terms of physical characteristics from each other.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it is specified that the particles are identical fermions or bosons, then stuff get difficult to understand. But if you ignore this statistical stuff temporarily, and just assume the particles are not identical, and also assume that the particles don't interact, then here's how it goes:

When you have one particle in a one dimensional box, the wave function is

\psi:\mathbb{R}\times[-R,R]\to\mathbb{C}, \psi(t,x)

and the shrodinger's equation is

i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\psi = (-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\partial^2 + U(x))\psi

where the potential is constant on interval from -R to R, and infinite outside.

When you have two particles in a one dimensional box, the wave function is

\psi:\mathbb{R}\times[-R,R]\times[-R,R]\to\mathbb{C}, \psi(t,x_1,x_2)

and the shrodinger's equation is

<br /> i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\psi = (-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m_1}\partial^2_1 - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m_2}\partial^2_2 + U(x_1,x_2))\psi<br />

where the potential is some constant when (x_1,x_2)\in[-R,R]^2, and infinite when both or just other parameter is outside the interval.

Does this make sense?
 
What happens if I assume the particles are identitical?
 
You need to add spin terms to the equation, and antisymmetrize the wave functions.

I do not know if this example has a closed form solution or not in this case
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top