2 protons have less mass than combined

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cbray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Protons
Cbray
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
I was reading an article about how two protons have less mass combined than by themselves to make helium, which gives off left over energy around 0.7% of their mass.

How is this possible? Why do they have less mass combined?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have it backwards in your first line. Combined they have less mass. The missing energy is due to the binding energy that keeps them together in say, Helium.
 
Pengwuino said:
You have it backwards in your first line. Combined they have less mass. The missing energy is due to the binding energy that keeps them together in say, Helium.

So I'm guessing the amount of mass lost due to bindings is small? - And the energy left is for explosions ? :P
 
Yes, the mass lost is small (although the energy associated with that mass loss is huge by E = mc^2 compared to chemical reactions). That's what basically happens in nuclear reactions.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top