2012 disaster is solar activity

  • Thread starter Thread starter moejoe15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Activity Solar
AI Thread Summary
Concerns about solar activity, such as flares and coronal mass ejections, potentially causing widespread electronic failures are discussed, highlighting the vulnerability of modern electronics. The need for effective shielding against such solar events and electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) is emphasized, particularly for generators and vehicles. While older technology like magneto-powered generators may be less susceptible, newer models are more at risk due to their electronic components. The discussion suggests that industrial products might have better protection, and reaching out to manufacturers for information on shielding is recommended. Overall, proactive measures for safeguarding electronics against solar activity are deemed essential.
moejoe15
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
One of the things that is supposedly possibly happening as a 2012 disaster is solar activity like flares or coronal mass ejections. This is a good possibility even if it's all hysteria. These events can supposedly theoretically take out electronics. If this happened we would be hurting because everything has electronics these days.

We have an old magneto powered generator that would probably be completely unaffected by anything. But I also have a new Honda generator which I am sure is loaded with electronics.

The question is this: Is there a simple way to shield things from being fried by anything the sun can do? I know how to shield from magnetic fields, that's easy. But solar activity and maybe EMP? I want to know that no matter what happens I can run my generator and it wouldn't hurt to not have all the computers in my cars melt either.

I am not asking for anyone to refute the possibility of this happening, I want to prevent it regardless.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Yes, it is possible and although consumer products probably aren't being protected, industrial products I think for the most part, are being protected. The products I developed were all subjected to electrostatic testing. Base station transmitters and receivers naturally have to be designed to withstand lightning strikes.

After a product has been designed and sold, generally it's pretty difficult to add additional shielding. You might try to contact the manufacturer and try to find out how much protection there is. I used to work with an engineer who had a knack for getting to the design engineers of a product and getting them to answer key questions about the design.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Back
Top