MHB #23 intersecting vector equations of 2 lines

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines Vector
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 1504

the calcs are mine, the only way I could see to solve this was to convert these to the $y=mx+b$ line eq and solve simultaneously to the intersection of $(x,y)$

not sure how you take them as they are given and find point P the intersection just as vectors.

also, I tried to input a vector equation of a line in W|A but my syntax didn't produce the correct line. or is there a an input for that.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try this, yielding $P=\langle 2,3 \rangle$.
 
nice to know that

so $(\lambda,\tau)$ is the intersection?
 
No, it is not. $\lambda$ and $t$ are two parameters that, when you change them, help you to traverse the two lines given by the two vector equations you have. To find the point, plug in $\lambda=-1$ into the first equation, or $t=1$ into the second, and the coordinates you get there will be what you need.
 
Another approach would be to write the system:

$$5+3\lambda=-2+4t$$

$$1-2\lambda=2+t$$

simplify:

$$4t-3\lambda=7$$

$$t+2\lambda=-1$$

Subtracting 4 times the latter equation from the former, we find:

$$-11\lambda=11\implies\lambda=-1$$

Hence:

$$P=(5+3(-1),1-2(-1))=(2,3)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top