230 V AC vs. 230 V DC: Which is More Dangerous?

  • Thread starter Thread starter namannitant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ac Dc
AI Thread Summary
230 V AC is generally considered more dangerous than 230 V DC due to its ability to disrupt the heart's electrical signals at low currents, potentially causing fatal arrhythmias. While DC can also be lethal, it typically requires higher currents to cause harm, primarily through thermal burns rather than electrical interference. The skin effect in AC at higher frequencies is not a significant factor in this context. Additionally, high power DC poses unique risks because it is harder to switch off or disconnect, increasing the danger in practical applications. Overall, both AC and DC can be deadly, but their mechanisms of harm differ significantly.
namannitant
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Which would be more dangerous for a human being 230 V a.c or 230 V dc supply...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming enough current both can kill you.
 
People say that the DC is more lethal and painful because it runs through the center, while the AC is concentrated around of the conductor.

does anyone know if it's true?
 
Carlos Dutra said:
People say that the DC is more lethal and painful because it runs through the center, while the AC is concentrated around of the conductor.
does anyone know if it's true?
Not really, at higher frequencies AC travels in the surface of a conductor (the skin effect) but that's not relevant here.

AC can kill you at very low currents (0.01A) because the heart uses electrical signals. A small 50/60Hz AC current through the heart causes it to try and beat at 50/60 times per second which doesn't work for very long.

DC kills you be simply burning so you need a lot more current.

But high power DC can be a lot more dangerous in use. It's very difficult to switch off DC or disconnect something that is attached to it.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top