How Do You Balance the Equation for Copper (II) Chloride Dihydrate and Aluminum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jessica.so
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing the chemical equation for the reaction between copper (II) chloride dihydrate and aluminum. The initial equation presented was CuCl2 ∙ 2H2O + Al --> AlCl3 + Cu + H2O, which was later balanced to 3 CuCl2 ∙ 2H2O + 2 Al --> 2 AlCl3 + 3 Cu + 2 H2O. There was uncertainty regarding the coefficient for water, with a suggestion that it should be 6 due to the presence of three CuCl2 ∙ 2H2O units. The correct balanced equation ultimately includes 6 H2O, leading to the final balanced equation: 3 CuCl2 ∙ 2H2O + 2 Al --> 2 AlCl3 + 3 Cu + 6 H2O. Clarification on the notation of CuCl2 ∙ 2H2O was also provided.
jessica.so
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Copper (II) Chloride dihydrate is mixed with solid aluminum. Find the products and balance the equation.


Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


The original equation that I got was:
CuCl2 ∙ 2H2O + Al --> AlCl3 + Cu + H2O
When I balanced it, I got:
3 CuCl2 ∙ 2H2O + 2 Al --> 2 AlCl3 + 3 Cu + 2 H2O
but I'm unsure about that. I am just wondering if the H2O at the end of the equation should have a coefficient of 6 because 3 [CuCl2 ∙ 2 H2O] were needed. So then the equation would be:
3 CuCl2 ∙ 2H2O + 2 Al --> 2 AlCl3 + 3 Cu + 6 H2O instead?
I do not know which one is correct. Please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Should be 6.

Note that CuCl2.2H2O is equivalent to CuCl2(H2O)2 or even CuCl2H4O2.
 
Ohh OKAY! Thanks so much!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top