A Proton is fired from far away towards the nuclues of a mercury Atom

AI Thread Summary
A proton is fired towards a mercury atom's nucleus, which has a diameter of 14.0 femtometers (fm). The initial kinetic energy of the proton is calculated using its mass and speed, while the potential energy at closest approach is determined using the charges of the proton and the nucleus. The discussion emphasizes the need to convert the charges of the nucleons into Coulombs for accurate calculations. The key relationship established is that the kinetic energy at a distance far from the nucleus equals the potential energy at the closest approach. The final goal is to solve for the separation distance, r, using the equation that equates kinetic and potential energy.
Blitzp22
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A proton is fired from far away towards the nucleus of a mercury atom. Mercury is element number 80, and the diameter of the nucleus is 14.0 fm. If the proton is fired at a speed of 32100000 m/s, what is its closest approach to the surface of the nucleus (in fm)? Assume that the nucleus remains at rest.


Homework Equations



U=kq1q2/r
kinematic equation
K = 1/2 m v^2

The Attempt at a Solution



So I got this far
1/2(1.67E-27)(3.21E7)^2=(9E9)(q1)(q2)/7fm

but I don't know what to do about the q1 and q2 to get my final answer. Hmmmm toughy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The q's are the charges on the nucleii. You can look them up on a periodic table. Remember, the charge shown on the table is in terms of electron or proton charges which you must convert into the standard unit of Coulombs. No doubt you have the charge of an electron in one of your lists.

Your calc is right, but difficult for me or your teacher to understand. Maybe you, too. You really should start with a general statement that shows your method of attack. Something like this:

Kinetic energy far out is entirely converted to potential energy at the closest approach
or KE far out = PE @ turnaround
 
yeah but in response to Delphi51's comments, then what are searching for? you would've filled all the unknowns in the equation
 
Welcome to PF, richnut.
You would still be looking for the separation distance, which is the r in the original post. It just makes more sense to write:
KE far out = PE @ turnaround
1/2 m v^2 = kq1q2/r
The first step clarifies what the second means. Then you go on to solve for r.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top