2nd Kirchhoff's law for all passive elements

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Law
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
How would be the 2nd Kirchhoff's law for this circuit here:

attachment.php?attachmentid=70425&stc=1&d=1402186250.png


I'm asking because I don't know how is the behavior of the inductor, capacitor and current source wrt the 2nd Kirchhoff's law...
 

Attachments

  • cc.PNG
    cc.PNG
    1.2 KB · Views: 640
on Phys.org
Kirchhoff's 2nd law states that the sum of the voltages around a loop is zero. It also applies to inductors and capacitors so..

VI + VR + VL + VC = 0

The voltage (particularly on Inductors and capacitors) is time dependent but the above still applies at any instant in time.
 
CWatters said:
Kirchhoff's 2nd law states that the sum of the voltages around a loop is zero. It also applies to inductors and capacitors so..

VI + VR + VL + VC = 0

The voltage (particularly on Inductors and capacitors) is time dependent but the above still applies at any instant in time.

And if I add a voltage source in series in this circuit, the equation will be so:

VI + VR + VL + VC = VV

Yeah!?
 
Jhenrique said:
And if I add a voltage source in series in this circuit, the equation will be so:

VI + VR + VL + VC = VV

Yeah!?

Yeah!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yes. Although it might be better to write it as..

VI + VR + VL + VC - VV = 0

Did you realize you may have implied a different orientation for the additional voltage source VV?
 

Attachments

  • attachment.png
    attachment.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 504
Last edited:
CWatters said:
Yes. Although it might be better to write it as..

VI + VR + VL + VC - VV = 0

Did you realize you may have implied a different orientation for the additional voltage source VV?

CWatters said:
or if you prefer

Interesting and confused!
 
But I don't think so... I place in the left side of the equation the potential difference that favors the circulation of the current and I place in the right side the potential differences opposes the circulation of the current. I can't think in another way more intuitive...
 
It's not always obvious if a "voltage" opposes or increases the current. Best practice is to mark your diagram in a consistent way, then go around each loop summing all the voltages. Then solve any simultaneous equations (eg for circuits with multiple loops). You may well find some unknown voltages turn out -ve when you were expecting them to be +ve.