2nd order Differential Eq. - Reduction of Order

leonida
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with differential equations - 2nd order - reduction of order

my problem is as follows:
(x − 1)y" − xy' + y = 0 , x > 1 ; y_1(x) = e^x

solving this type of diff. eq. says to use y=y_1(x)V(x) which gives me y=Ve^x differentiating y gives me
y'=V'e^x &
y''=V''e^x

when pluged into original equation i have

(x-1)e^xV''-xe^xV'=0 with substitution V'=u

from this point on i am not sure whether i should omit (x-1) since x>1 and cannot be zero, or should i include it. But no matter which road i take, i get a solution that includes some combination of ex . book gives me solution as x, which, upon check is the right solution.. help how to get there is appreciated !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget the product rule when differentiating.
 
206,
thanks for the help. i always forget to apply this rule.. but still this does not lead me to the answer...

so.. i Have
y=Ve^x
y'=V'e^x + Ve^x
y''=V''e^x + 2V'e^x+Ve^x
pluging back in original equations gives me
(x-1)V''e^x+2V'e^x+V'xe^x=0
setting all the members with V=0 and factoring out ex, since it cannot be zero i am left with
(x-1)V''+V'(x+2)=0
substituting V'=u
u'=-u (x+2)/(x-1)
du/u=-(x+2)dx/(x-1)
this gives me wild answer, and i need to be at y2=xhelp please...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top