3 Photons going through 3 Polarizers

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshWard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
JoshWard
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose we set up a sequence of three polarizers with orientations 45 degrees, 75 degrees and 45 degrees, where the angles refer to how much each polarizer is rotated relative to the vertical direction.

If we send three vertically (i.e. 0 degrees) polarized photons in either 0, 1, 2, or 3 photons might pass through all the polarizers. What is the probability for each of these possibilities?

Homework Equations



lθ> = cos(θ)l0 degrees> + sin(θ)l90 degrees> (Dirac Notation)
Probability = cos^2(θ)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well what I have is that when the photons go through the first polarizer, the probability of 1 getting through is 50%, 25% for 2 and so on. Then the photons become polarized at 45 degrees. I'm just having a hard time figuring out how to continue through the 75 degrees polarizer and the last 45 degree polarizer. All I want to know is how to set up the photons going through the 75 degree polarizer, from there I can get the rest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say the probability is equal to ##\cos^2 \theta##, what exactly does ##\theta## represent? If you understand that, how to deal with the second polarizer is straightforward.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top