Proving 1+2+4+...+2^(n-1)=2^(n)-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustang
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the formula 1+2+4+...+2^(n-1)=2^(n)-1 using mathematical induction. The proof begins with establishing the base case for n=1 and then assumes the formula holds for n=k, leading to the conclusion that it also holds for n=k+1. Additionally, the thread touches on solving a series involving alternating sums and the salary progression of a doctor with a 10% annual increase, illustrating how to calculate total earnings over a decade. The geometric series formula is applied in both cases to derive the necessary sums. Overall, the thread emphasizes the use of mathematical principles to solve series and sequences effectively.
mustang
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Problem 16.
Show that 1+2+4+...+26(n-1)=2^(n)-1
I first decided to use the formula: a_n=a_1*r^(n-1)

Problem24. Find the sum of the series 1-3+5-7+9-11+...+1001.

Problem 26. Suppose a doctor earns $40,000 during the first year of practice. Suppose also that each succeeding year the salary increases 10%. What is the total of the doctor's salaries over the first 10 years? How many years must the doctor work if the salary total is to exceed a million dollars?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mustang said:
Problem 16.
Show that 1+2+4+...+26(n-1)=2^(n)-1
I first decided to use the formula: a_n=a_1*r^(n-1)
That's not the correct formula. If you want to find the nth term in a sequence that might be useful, but you want to find the nth term in a series. There is a different formula, I don't remember off-hand, I'm sure you can look it up or find it in your textbook. However, if you need to prove it, you can do a simple proof by induction.

Problem24. Find the sum of the series 1-3+5-7+9-11+...+1001.
Notice that every consecutive pair of terms sums to -2, e.g. 1-2 = -2, 5-7 = -2, etc. Your answer should be 1001 - 2x, where x is the number of pairs. The first pair is (1,-3) and the last pair would be (997,-999). It's a simple matter of some simple division to find out x.

Problem 26. Suppose a doctor earns $40,000 during the first year of practice. Suppose also that each succeeding year the salary increases 10%. What is the total of the doctor's salaries over the first 10 years? How many years must the doctor work if the salary total is to exceed a million dollars?
You can express this as a series. a_1 = \$ 40,000, r = 1.1 because he gets a 10% increase each year, so his salary will be 10% greater than the previous year, which is 110% times more than the previous year, which is 1.1 times more than the previous year.
 


To prove that 1+2+4+...+2^(n-1)=2^(n)-1, we can use mathematical induction. First, we will prove the base case, n=1.

When n=1, the left side of the equation becomes 1, and the right side becomes 2^1-1=1. Therefore, the equation holds true for n=1.

Next, we will assume that the equation holds true for some arbitrary value k, where k is a positive integer.

This means that 1+2+4+...+2^(k-1)=2^k-1.

Now, we will prove that the equation also holds true for n=k+1.

When n=k+1, the left side of the equation becomes 1+2+4+...+2^(k-1)+2^k.

By our assumption, we know that 1+2+4+...+2^(k-1)=2^k-1.

Substituting this into the left side of the equation, we get 2^k-1+2^k.

Using the properties of exponents, we can rewrite this as 2^k+2^k=2^(k+1).

Therefore, the left side of the equation becomes 2^(k+1), which is equal to the right side of the equation.

Thus, we have proven that 1+2+4+...+2^(n-1)=2^(n)-1 for all positive integer values of n.

Moving on to Problem 16, we can use the same formula a_n=a_1*r^(n-1) to find the sum of the series.

In this case, a_1=1 and r=2, since each term is twice the previous one.

So, a_n=1*2^(n-1)=2^(n-1).

To find the sum of the series, we can use the formula for the sum of a geometric series:

S_n=a_1*(1-r^n)/(1-r)

Plugging in our values, we get S_n=1*(1-2^n)/(1-2)=1*(1-2^n)/(-1)=2^n-1.

Therefore, the sum of the series 1+2+4+...+2
 


To prove this statement, we can use mathematical induction.

First, we will show that the statement is true for n=1.
1+2^(1-1)=1+1=2
2^1-1=2-1=1
Thus, the statement is true for n=1.

Next, we will assume that the statement is true for some positive integer k.
1+2+4+...+2^(k-1)=2^k-1

We will now prove that the statement is also true for n=k+1.
1+2+4+...+2^(k-1)+2^k=2^(k+1)-1
Using our assumption, we can rewrite the left side as:
2^k-1+2^k=2^(k+1)-1
Therefore, the statement is true for n=k+1.

Since we have shown that the statement is true for n=1 and that it being true for n=k implies it is true for n=k+1, we can conclude that the statement is true for all positive integers n. Hence, 1+2+4+...+2^(n-1)=2^(n)-1 is true.

Problem 24.
To find the sum of the given series, we can group the terms in pairs.
1-3= -2
5-7= -2
9-11= -2
...
1001-x= -2
We can see that there are 500 pairs of -2, so the sum of the series is -2*500=-1000.

Problem 26.
The doctor's salary over the first 10 years can be represented as:
$40,000 + $44,000 + $48,400 + ... + $1,048,576
This is a geometric series with a common ratio of 10%. Using the formula for the sum of a geometric series, we can calculate the total salary over 10 years to be $2,097,151.

To find the number of years it takes for the total salary to exceed a million dollars, we can set up the following inequality:
$40,000 + $44,000 + $48,400 + ... + $1,048,576 > $1,000,000
Using the formula for the sum of a geometric
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top