Transmission Coefficient for two step potential

th5418
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


E>V_1 & V_2
So it's a step potential wave, setup. Let's set it up along the x axis. At x=0, there is the first step where it is V_1. At x=a, there is another step, where V_2>V_1. Show that the transmission coefficient is...
T=\frac{4k_1k_2^{2}k_3}{k_2^{2}(k_1+k_2)^{2}+(k_3^{2}-k_2^{2})(k_1^{2}-k_2^{2})sin^{2}k_2a}

Homework Equations


So the usual transmission is just T=(\frac{A}{F})^{2} where A is the coefficient for incoming wave, and F is coefficient for leaving wave. However, one of my friend says that the transmission coefficient has extra terms in it because the velocity of the wave is different. Please help!

The Attempt at a Solution


I have the eigenfunctions..
\varphi_1 = Ae^{ik_1x} + Be^{-ik_1x}

k_1 = \sqrt{\frac{2mE}{h}}

\varphi_2 = Ce^{ik_2x} + De^{-ik_2x}

k_2 = \sqrt{\frac{2m(E-V_1)}{h}}

\varphi_3 = Fe^{ik_3x}

k_3 = \sqrt{\frac{2m(E-V_2)}{h}}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The velocity of a complex plane wave has no effect on its (average) probability density.1 However, I think that you have the expression upside down.



1I say average to account for the small-scale fluctuations that can result from interference.
 
The velocity of the wave affects the probability flux of the wave. The transmission probability is properly defined as the ratio of the probability flux of the transmitted and the incident wave. In the potential step case the transmission probability is then

T = \frac{|\boldsymbol{k}'|}{|\boldsymbol{k}|}\frac{|F|^2}{|A|^2}

if A is the amplitude of the incident wave, \boldsymbol{k} is its wave vector, F the amplitude of the transmitted wave and \boldsymbol{k}' its wave vector. It is described in more detail http://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node149.html" . (On the bottom of the page there is a link to the probability flux discussion).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top