3D phase space of point particle and spinors.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Can we make a connection?

Consider the phase space of a point particle in R^3. Six numbers are required, three for position and three for velocity.

Now consider an isotropic vector, X, in C^3 with X*X = 0.
X = (x1,x2,x3), X*X = (x1*x1 + x2*x2 + x3*x3),
x1 = c1 + i*c2, x1*x1 = (c1*c1 + c2*c2 +2*i*c1*c2)

From:

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/spinor.htm

"It can be shown that the set of isotropic vectors in C^3 form a two dimensional surface. This two dimensional surface can be parametrized by two coordinates, z0 and z1 where

z0 = [(x1-ix2)/2]1/2
z1 = i[(x1+ix2)/2]1/2.

The complex two dimensional vector Z=(z0, z1) Cartan calls a spinor. But a spinor is not just a two dimensional complex vector; it is a representation of an isotropic three dimensional complex vector."


Let the real part of X represent the position of a point particle and let the imaginary part of X represent the velocity of the same particle. If we require X*X = 0 how does that restrict the phase space path of a particle?

Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top