3d Shape with lowest drag coefficient subsonic ground level

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying the 3D shape with the lowest drag coefficient for a motorcycle at subsonic speeds and ground level. A symmetrical airfoil with a truncated tail is suggested, though concerns are raised about increased drag from truncation. The NACA 0021 airfoil is considered, but challenges arise in modifying it to meet specific dimensions while maintaining optimal drag characteristics. The ideal fineness ratio for ground performance is noted as 5:1, with aspirations to achieve a drag coefficient below 0.1 for speeds around 200 kph. Ultimately, the NACA 0021 remains a strong candidate, but its adaptability and testing limitations are acknowledged.
Streamline
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

What shape has the lowest drag coefficient at ground level and at subsonic speeds (0-150kph) with the following dimensions?

Width 60cm (at 45%)
Height 120cm (at 45%)
Length 220cm

These dimensions will fit my motorcycle (not too narrow and not too long).

I am thinking it would be a symmetrical airfoil with a truncated tail but I do not know for sure. That is why I am asking.

The shape will have 10-20cm ground clearance.

Thank you for your time, this stuff is way over my head.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A teardrop shape would likely be pretty close to ideal. Truncating the tail would likely increase drag.
 
I'd have to agree with you there.

I have been looking at airfoiltools.com.

Stretching the naca 0021 airofoil to 128.7% gives the required 60cm thickness with a 220cm chord. However the widest point is at 30% length not 45% length. It is impossible to change this. Also the changed airfoil cannot be tested to determine it's drag coefficient.

The same naca0021 airfoil would be stretched vertically to double the thickness to reach the required height of 120cm. However this is impossible to create and impossible to test.

Considering that a naca0021 airfoil with a fineness ratio of 3:1 is perfect in the air and 5:1 ratio on the ground I definitely want to get as close to the latter ratio.

Using the perfect shape of the naca 0021 airfoil I should be able to achieve sub 0.1 drag coefficient and reach speeds of around 200kph at 10kw.

It is unknown if there is a shape better than the naca 0021.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top