4 Momentum and 4 velocity relationship

bayners123
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
<br /> P = \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> E/c<br /> \\ \bar{p}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

and

<br /> U = \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> \gamma c<br /> \\ \gamma \bar{v}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

right? But I frequently see in textbooks that P = m_0 U. Surely,
m_0 U = <br /> \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> \gamma m_0 c<br /> \\ \gamma m_0 \bar{v}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> =<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> E/c<br /> \\ \gamma \bar{p}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> \neq<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> E/c<br /> \\ \bar{p}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

So how does this work?
Yours confusedly
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bayners123 said:
<br /> P = \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> E/c<br /> \\ \bar{p}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

and

<br /> U = \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> \gamma c<br /> \\ \gamma \bar{v}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

right? But I frequently see in textbooks that P = m_0 U. Surely,
m_0 U = <br /> \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> \gamma m_0 c<br /> \\ \gamma m_0 \bar{v}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> =<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> E/c<br /> \\ \gamma \bar{p}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> \neq<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c}<br /> E/c<br /> \\ \bar{p}<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

So how does this work?
Yours confusedly

The p in (E/c,p) is three momentum but it is still relativistic three momentum not Newtonian 3-momentum. Thus p=γmv, and your confusion is resolved.
 
PAllen said:
The p in (E/c,p) is three momentum but it is still relativistic three momentum not Newtonian 3-momentum. Thus p=γmv, and your confusion is resolved.

Ah, thanks
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Back
Top