In special relativity we can view spacetime as ##\mathbb{R}^4## with its standard smooth structure, and a metric ##\eta_{ab} = \sum\limits_{\mu, \nu = 0}^3 \eta_{\mu, \nu} (dx^\mu)_a (dx^\nu)_b## where ##\nu_{\mu \nu} = \mathrm{diag}(-1, 1, 1, )##. Given a curve ##\gamma: I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^4## (where ##I## is an interval), let ##T## be the tangent vector field on ##\gamma##. Then we define the proper time as ##\tau = \int (-\eta_{ab}T^aT^b)^{1/2} dt##, where ##t## parametrizes ##\gamma##. We define timelike curves as curves whose proper time is negative. Now, Wald says that "we may parametrize timelike curves by the proper time ##\tau##". How are we parametrizing the curve using ##\tau##? Are we parametrizing it in the sense that, for each given ##t##, some portion of the curve is traced out, and its proper time (its length, in a sense) is given by ##\tau##? I believe this is what he must mean, but please correct me if I am wrong.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

But onto the main reason for my post: In the same notation as above, given a timelike curve parametrized by ##\tau##, the tangent vector ##u^a## is defined as the ##4-##velocity of the curve. Wald says that it follows directly from the definition of ##\tau## that the ##4-##velocity has unit length: ##\eta(u, u) = -1##. I don't see how this is true?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I 4-velocity of a timelike curve in special relativity

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**