What units are used after eV, MeV, GeV, etc, are divided by c^2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Juxtaroberto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ev Units
Juxtaroberto
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I know that the mass of subatomic particles is usually given in electronvolts, and that c^{2} is set to 1 so that we can say, "This particle has a mass of 13 eV." However, if you divide 13 eV by c^{2}, you get an answer, x. What units is this in?

Oh, also, what units do we use c in in the first place? km/s, m/s, mi/s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe it is Kilograms or grams since that is the unit of mass. Cant say for the c.
 
Juxtaroberto said:
I know that the mass of subatomic particles is usually given in electronvolts

This is sloppy language which is unfortunately commonly used by physicists.

The electron-volt (eV) is a unit of energy, equal to 1.602e-19 joule.

When someone says "the mass of an electron is 511 keV" he really means, "the energy-equivalent of the mass of an electron is 511 keV" or "the rest-energy of an electron is 511 keV" or "the mass of an electron is 511 keV/c^2." Mathematically,

m_e c^2 = 511 \rm{ keV}

Dividing through by c^2 we get

m_e = 511 \rm{ keV}/c^2

so the eV/c^2 is a unit of mass, equal to (1.602e-19 J)/(2.998e8 m/s)^2 = 1.782e-36 kg.

To check this, 511 keV = 511 x 1000 x 1.782e-36 kg = 9.108e-31 kg which is indeed the mass of an electron in kg.
 
Last edited:
This language is fortunately commonly used by physicists.
There are several systems of units in which c=1 and is dimensionless.
(Distance in light-years and time in years is one.)
All of those systems are more useful than kg or joules in describing an electron.
 
clem said:
There are several systems of units in which c=1 and is dimensionless.
(Distance in light-years and time in years is one.)

I wouldn't call "light-years per year" dimensionless.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top