In General Relativity, what would happen to the Earth the Sun disappeared?

MegaDeth
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if this is in the right forum.

If the Sun disappeared, would the Earth's velocity change? Since the space-time fabric would 'spring' back into it's normal position, the effect of gravity on the Earth would dissipate? Thus, resulting in the Earth being thrown out of it's orbit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MegaDeth said:
I'm not sure if this is in the right forum.

If the Sun disappeared, would the Earth's velocity change? Since the space-time fabric would 'spring' back into it's normal position, the effect of gravity on the Earth would dissipate? Thus, resulting in the Earth being thrown out of it's orbit?

What orbit? If the sun disappeared, then 8 minutes later the Earth would HAVE no orbit because it would have nothing to orbit AROUND. It would just keep going in whatever direction it was headed in 8 minutes after the sun disappeared.
 
phinds said:
What orbit? If the sun disappeared, then 8 minutes later the Earth would HAVE no orbit because it would have nothing to orbit AROUND. It would just keep going in whatever direction it was headed in 8 minutes after the sun disappeared.

Yes, I know that, but what I'm asking is, would it's velocity change since there's no gravity acting upon it from the Sun which has disappeared?
 
You're going to end up in a logically self-contradictory position if you try to answer this question within GR. GR has local conservation of mass-energy, and therefore it doesn't allow the sun to disappear. GR becomes logically inconsistent if you assume violation of conservation of mass-energy.

If the sun was suddenly ripped out of the solar system and taken far away, GR says that the disturbance in the gravitational field would travel at c, so the Earth would continue in its original orbit for another 8 minutes.
 
bcrowell said:
You're going to end up in a logically self-contradictory position if you try to answer this question within GR. GR has local conservation of mass-energy, and therefore it doesn't allow the sun to disappear. GR becomes logically inconsistent if you assume violation of conservation of mass-energy.

If the sun was suddenly ripped out of the solar system and taken far away, GR says that the disturbance in the gravitational field would travel at c, so the Earth would continue in its original orbit for another 8 minutes.

Thanks, that has helped me a lot. By gravitational field, I assume you're referring to the curvature of space-time?
 
MegaDeth said:
Thanks, that has helped me a lot. By gravitational field, I assume you're referring to the curvature of space-time?

Right.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top