I just read somwhere thatif cos a = cos dthen a=2n(pi)±d where

  • Thread starter Thread starter sparsh12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cos
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation involving cosine, specifically the condition that if cos(a) = cos(d), then a = 2nπ ± d, where n is an integer. The user attempts to apply this to the expression involving logarithms, leading to the equation b*ln(i/j) = 2nπ ± b*ln(j/i). However, it's pointed out that while this equation holds, it may not yield interesting results, especially when n=0. A critical error is identified in the user's manipulation, where they divide by ln(i/j) + ln(j/i), which can lead to division by zero. The conclusion emphasizes the need for careful handling of mathematical identities and potential pitfalls in algebraic manipulation.
sparsh12
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
i just read somwhere that

if cos a = cos d

then a=2n(pi)±d where n is integer

So, if cos (b*ln (i/j))= cos (-b (lni/j))=cos(b*ln(j/i))

can i write
b*ln i/j = 2n(pi)±b*ln(j/i)
or
bln(j/i)+bln(i/j)=2n(pi) or 2n(pi)=0
b=n(pi)/(ln(i/j)-ln(j/i))=n(pi)/(b*ln(i/j))

then replace b in
cos(b*lni/j)=cos(n(pi))= ±1

I feel that something is wrong. But what?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


sparsh12 said:
i just read somwhere that

if cos a = cos d

then a=2n(pi)±d where n is integer

This isn't entirely true... for example, cos(pi/2) and cos(3pi/2) are equal.

b*ln i/j = 2n(pi)±b*ln(j/i)

This is definitely true, but not as interesting as it might look at first sight. Just take n=0 and b*ln(i/j)=-b*ln(j/i) (note that the statement is a=2n(pi)+d for SOME integer n, not every integer)

b=n(pi)/(ln(i/j)+ln(j/i))=n(pi)/(b*ln(i/j))

When you divide by ln(i/j)+ln(j/i) you divided by zero. I'm unsure where your last equality comes from
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top