GRE Scores & Admissions Decisions: Physics General & General Tests

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of GRE scores in graduate admissions, particularly in physics. Participants express frustration over the necessity of standardized testing despite strong GPAs, with one noting a 3.95 GPA as evidence of capability. It is suggested that GRE scores primarily serve as elimination criteria rather than comparative metrics. A strong GPA and research experience are emphasized as more critical factors in admissions decisions. The GRE provides a uniform assessment, allowing applicants from varying grading systems to demonstrate their abilities. While some believe that UC schools may prioritize the GRE General test more than others, the consensus is that a well-rounded application, including strong academic records and research, can mitigate the impact of lower GRE scores. Overall, applicants are encouraged to focus on their strengths and not let GRE scores overshadow their accomplishments.
HunterR
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,
Does anyone have any experience with admissions committee decisions regarding GRE scores? How much weight (over GPA or even research experience) do they carry on the admissions decision? (Physics General and/or General test)
I have very strong feelings against the GRE's. I find it ridiculous that after earning a 3.95 GPA in Physics I have to "show" again I'm capable of "doing" physics. But that's just my opinion.
Any comments?

All the best,
HunterR :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, the GRE scores are used only as criteria for elimination, and not criteria for comparison. If either of your GRE scores are terrible, you will not be accepted, but I don't think the score itself goes into some kind of a formula to determine your qualification. More important are your research experience and references/recommendations.

The reason you are taking the GRE physics test, despite having a 3.95 GPA is that the GRE is a standardized test that everyone takes and allows for a uniform asessment. If someone comes from a department that is draconian with grading, then s/he has an opportunity to prove that the GPA being low is a false indicator, by scoring high on the GRE. The opposite holds true too. If you have a fantastic GPA but do terribly on the GRE, then your GPA starts to look suspicious.

And this may only be a rumor, but I've heard that the UC schools give a little more importance to the GRE General test than most other.
 


Hello HunterR,

I completely understand your frustration with the GRE scores and their role in the admissions decision. While they do carry some weight, they are not the only factor that admissions committees consider. Your GPA and research experience are also important factors in the decision-making process.

In my experience, a strong GPA in physics and a solid research background can outweigh a lower GRE score. Admissions committees are looking for well-rounded candidates who not only have a strong academic record but also have the potential to excel in their graduate studies.

That being said, it is always important to aim for a competitive GRE score to strengthen your application. But do not let the GRE scores discourage you or overshadow your other accomplishments. Admissions committees understand that standardized tests do not always accurately reflect a student's potential and abilities.

Best of luck in your admissions journey! Don't let the GRE scores bring you down. Keep highlighting your strengths and showcasing your passion for physics in your application.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Back
Top