Which edition of Stewart's Calculus is best for reference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around choosing between the 5th and 6th editions of a calculus textbook for review purposes. Users suggest that the 5th edition is a cost-effective option, as updates in the 6th edition are often minor, such as corrections and additional problems. The consensus is that for occasional review, either edition is sufficient, and the best choice may depend on price and condition rather than significant content differences. Some participants mention that if the goal is to use the book as a reference, the edition used during the original course might be preferable. There is also a suggestion to consider alternative texts, like Salas & Etgen, which provide proofs alongside the material. Overall, the focus is on practicality and cost-effectiveness in selecting a calculus textbook for review.
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
I finished the calculus sequence several years ago and I just want a reference. Apparently there are two editions that are widely in use now: 5 and 6. This is probably a stupid question, but which one should I get? I would assume that 6 is better because 6>5, but I don't know...I thought I would ask anyway.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Buy this one

 
Cyrus said:
Buy this one


Are you joking?
 
Why am I joking? I have that book: its very good.
 
Well I want to buy one of the two editions that I listed.
 
What text did you use when you took the class?

When I want to review a subject I took in the past, I use the same text that I had when I took the class.
 
calculus doesn't change. buy 5 because it will be cheaper than 6.
 
4th or 5th edition is fine. don't waste your money on the 6th unless you're in a class that requires you to turn in hw.
 
Basically. The updates from one edition to the other are usually minor. Maybe some typos fixed, new figures, different homework problems, but I have edition 5e and it has a ton of problems, so you shouldn't run out or anything.

Mines "early transcendentals", though, not the one Cyrus posted. No idea if those are different or not.
 
  • #10
Last edited:
  • #11
Maybe he condensed some things down to cut down on paper? Maybe people are just tired of Stewart's BS and aren't going to take it from him anymore?
 
  • #12
Perhaps it would help to compare Tables of Contents

http://academic.cengage.com/cengage/student.do?codeid=2B76&sortby=copy&type=all_radio&courseid=MA03&product_isbn=9780534393397&disciplinenumber=1&codeFlag=true

http://academic.cengage.com/cengage/student.do?codeid=2B76&sortby=copy&type=all_radio&courseid=MA03&product_isbn=9780495011606&disciplinenumber=1&codeFlag=true

A quick scan doesn't reveal any substantial difference. The 6th edition seems to have added sections: Review. Problems Plus. to each chapter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
In general, if you want to buy a textbook to keep as a reference for occasional review, I think whatever one you can get in the best condition for the lowest price (this could be the newer edition if it's the one being used in a lot of classes...more people selling them back in barely used condition at the end of the course :wink:, or more bookstores with overstock to get rid of).

Unless there has been massive rearrangement of the material, in which case it might be more of a personal preference which suits your learning needs best, it's rare for there to be substantial differences between editions (there are always corrections of errors, and some reorganization of content for better clarity based on student/educator feedback, but for the purpose of review, this is not usually important...if you were learning the material from scratch, I'd always recommend the most current book to have the least errors unless someone using it specifically points out that it is worse for some reason).
 
  • #14
Get Salas & Etgen. Its Stewart with proofs.
 
  • #15
Too late.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top