65W bulbs connected in parallel (hopefully easy)

  • Thread starter Thread starter HyperSniper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
AI Thread Summary
To determine how many 65W light bulbs can be connected in parallel across 85V without exceeding a total current of 2.1A, the current drawn by each bulb is calculated as I = P/V, resulting in approximately 0.76A per bulb. Dividing the maximum allowable current (2.1A) by the current per bulb indicates that a maximum of about 2.76 bulbs can be connected. Rounding down to ensure the current does not exceed 2.1A suggests that only 2 bulbs should be used. The discussion highlights the importance of precise calculations and rounding in electrical problems. Overall, the conclusion is that two 65W bulbs can be safely connected in parallel without exceeding the current limit.
HyperSniper
Messages
39
Reaction score
2
I know that this has to be an easy problem, but my teacher left us in December and we got stuck with an idiot who hasn't taught us anything since then...

Homework Statement


How many 65-W light bulbs can be connected in parallel across a potential difference of 85V before the total current in the circuit exceeds 2.1 A?

Homework Equations


\Sigma1/Req=1/R1+1/R2+1/R3...
P=IV
V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


I can't get an answer that makes any sense, but this is what I tried to do.

P=65-W
V=?
I=2.1A

P=IV
65=(2.1A)V
30.95V=V
R=14.738\Omega

X= number of bulbs

\epsilon= I((1/R)X)^-1
85V= (2.1A)(1/14\Omega)X)^-1
(14\Omega/X)(2.1A)=85V
29.4V/X=85V
29.4V=(85V)X
.34588=X
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume "before circuit exceeds 2.1A" is a typing mistake that means "before the total current out of the voltage source exceeds 2.1A".

Each bulb has a power rating P=VI, so it draws current I = P/V = calculate. That's one bulb. How many bulbs to reach the allowed maximum current?
 
Last edited:
Opps. I'm sorry, I'll go fix it.

So does that mean it's just...

65W/85V=.76A

2.1A=(X)(.76A)
X=2.76

Rounding down not to exceed the maximum...

2 bulbs?
 
It looks good to me. Just one suggestion for future problems that say "no not exceed" something, your rounding to 0.76 instead of saying 0.764 might have changed the answer. It's okay in this case.
 
Last edited:
Thank you.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top