What are the independent terms in the Magnetic Tensor

AI Thread Summary
The magnetic gradient tensor consists of nine components organized in a 3x3 matrix, but only five of these components are independent. This independence means that the remaining four components can be derived from the five independent terms, often due to mathematical relationships or symmetries within the tensor. Understanding this concept can be challenging, particularly when visualizing how the rates of change of different magnetic field components relate to each other. The discussion highlights the difficulty in grasping how one component's change can influence another's, emphasizing the need for clarity on the underlying principles of tensor mathematics. Insights into these relationships can aid in better understanding the magnetic gradient tensor's structure and its implications in magnetic field analysis.
welshrich
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to understand the magnetic gradient tensor which has nine components. There are three magnetic field components, but there are also three baselines. These nine gradients are organised into a 3x3 matrix. I have read that only 5 of these terms are independent. What exactly does this mean? What makes them independent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If five terms are independent than given those five terms you are able to calculate the others
 
Thanks that is helpful. I had been trying to visualise what is happening and not having much success - I can imagine splitting the magnetic vector into 3 components and then measuring the rate of change of each of these particular components in the three directions. I did not realize you can use some of the terms in the matrix to calculate others. I assumed that only 5 remained because the others somehow canceled each other due to symmetry. And this is where I am hitting a wall - I can't imagine how the rate of change of one component of the field with respect to a given baseline can be equal to the rate of change of another component of the field with respect to a particular baseline. Any insights?
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...

Similar threads

Back
Top