A 25W Light Bulb Married a GE Clock/Radio

AI Thread Summary
Wiring a 25W Edison bulb to an old GE clock/radio involves connecting the bulb in parallel with the device, resulting in a total current of about 0.3A. The clock/radio will still draw its normal current of 0.07A, ensuring it operates safely without exceeding the power cord's capacity. Safety concerns include ensuring proper wiring connections and securing any excess wire away from heat sources. The project does not have a safety ground, placing it in IEC safety class II, which requires double insulation to prevent hazardous voltage exposure. Proper strain relief and careful consideration of potential failure points are crucial for maintaining safety in this setup.
nathangriffin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm wiring a 25W Edison bulb to an old GE clock/radio.

The radio is 120V/60hz 8.5W input.

Basic calculation I = P/E would mean the current is 0.07A

If I wire the bulb in parallel between source and the clock/radio, there's now 0.2A for the bulb branch and 0.07A for the clock/radio branch making Current Total about 0.3A (300mA) correct?

In doing so, however, I haven't actually made any change to the current flowing through the radio, right? It's still 0.07A?

So if the power cord which goes from the source to the bulb branch (first) and then to the clock/radio branch is the only thing carrying 0.3A and is rated well above that, I'm not in any danger of burning up the clock/radio, yes?

My concern is safety (obviously) so any help is appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
nathangriffin,
Yes, you are correct. If the line cord can deliver the 300mA than the radio will continue to see the 120V it is expecting and will draw its normal load current.
I can appreciate your concern for safety. Tell me a little more about your scheme and I can give you some tips on safety.
Where will your lamp wiring be located, inside of the radio? Where is the lamp itself mounted?
Does the clock radio have a safety ground (third prong on line cord)?
 
Thank you for your response.

It's a pretty simple project, really... I think. I have an old clock radio. The cord is being replaced (re-soldered) using a new SPT-1 polarized plug/cord (two prong, one hot and one wide neutral) and I'm wiring the lamp socket in parallel on the source side of line, making my connection about 3" in from the step-down transformer in the clock/radio using orange wire nuts.

I'm connecting the line cord to the socket with 18AWG, remembering black to brass (to save my @ss) and, hopefully calling it a day? I've actually drilled a 1 3/8" hole in the top of the clock/radio and will secure the socket there. The only other thing I can think of for safety is, securing any extra wire away from things which heat up (eg. transformer)

Hmm. Can't think of anything else.

Again, if you can add anything, I'd love to know! I tried covering all my bases but had been out in the workshop these last two days debating whether I still remembered my principles, circuit basics, cause & effect etc!
 
nathangriffin said:
Thank you for your response.

It's a pretty simple project, really... I think. I have an old clock radio. The cord is being replaced (re-soldered) using a new SPT-1 polarized plug/cord (two prong, one hot and one wide neutral) and I'm wiring the lamp socket in parallel on the source side of line, making my connection about 3" in from the step-down transformer in the clock/radio using orange wire nuts.

I'm connecting the line cord to the socket with 18AWG, remembering black to brass (to save my @ss) and, hopefully calling it a day? I've actually drilled a 1 3/8" hole in the top of the clock/radio and will secure the socket there. The only other thing I can think of for safety is, securing any extra wire away from things which heat up (eg. transformer)

Hmm. Can't think of anything else.

Again, if you can add anything, I'd love to know! I tried covering all my bases but had been out in the workshop these last two days debating whether I still remembered my principles, circuit basics, cause & effect etc!

Welcome to the PF.

It sounds like you are thinking of the right safety issues. Does "black to brass" equate to wiring Hot to the center/tip connector for the light bulb? That's important. Also, are you mechanically strain relieving the cord where it goes into the device?
 
nathangriffin
No safety ground and use of AC mains puts this into IEC safety class II. Safety class II products are designed so that no single internal failure can pass hazardous voltage to an exposed conductor that a person can touch. This is generally done by either:
1 - Not having any exposed conductors (think hair dryer)
2 - Providing a double barrier between hazardous voltage and exposed conductors. The double barrier is designed so that it cannot be bridged by any single fault. (safety specs call this "double insulation", where insulation refers to any means of separation).

If your radio does have exposed metal, such as knobs, antenna, fasteners, you will want to make sure you don't compromise the barrier.
The idea is to assume a single failure occurs in your work, say your wire nut comes loose exposing your wires. Now look and see if that failure can cause AC mains to contact an exposed conductor. If so, add a second barrier. This could be as simple as a zip tie to hold the wires in a specific location. If both a zip tie and a wire nut have to fail to create a hazard then you are ok.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top