A beginning RC circuit that resembles a wheatstone bridge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on analyzing a modified Wheatstone bridge circuit that incorporates capacitors and a switch, specifically under DC conditions. The circuit consists of two capacitors with reactances of 300 ohms and 450 ohms, and resistors of 270 ohms and 120 ohms. The analysis reveals that with the switch closed, the capacitors behave as open circuits, resulting in zero current through the resistors. The final voltage across the capacitors is determined to be equal to the supply voltage after the charging process is complete.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Wheatstone bridge configurations
  • Knowledge of AC and DC circuit analysis
  • Familiarity with capacitive reactance and impedance calculations
  • Proficiency in differential equations and Laplace transforms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of capacitive reactance in AC circuits
  • Learn about the application of Laplace transforms in circuit analysis
  • Explore nodal and mesh analysis techniques for complex circuits
  • Investigate the behavior of capacitors in DC circuits and their charging characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, circuit designers, students studying electronics, and anyone interested in advanced circuit analysis techniques.

orthovector
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Everybody knows what a wheatstone bridge looks like. R1 and R2 are on top and R3 and R4 are on bottom and R5 is in the middle of the angled box shape.

let's replace R1 and R2 with 2 different capacitors. Let's also replace R5 with a switch.

How would you figure out the potential between R3 and R4?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming you have an AC supply, you work out the voltage across each capacitor by considering each C/R series circuit and then you subtract the voltages vectorially.

If one of the capacitors was variable and known (and R3 = R4 ), you could adjust it until the bridge was balanced (using an AC detector like an oscilloscope) and then the two capacitors would be equal and you would know the unknown one. You would then have a capacitance bridge.
 
vk6kro said:
Assuming you have an AC supply, you work out the voltage across each capacitor by considering each C/R series circuit and then you subtract the voltages vectorially.

If one of the capacitors was variable and known (and R3 = R4 ), you could adjust it until the bridge was balanced (using an AC detector like an oscilloscope) and then the two capacitors would be equal and you would know the unknown one. You would then have a capacitance bridge.

the capacitors are NOT variable nor are they equal. The resistors are NOT variable nor are they equal. There is no amp meter nor is there a voltmeter in the middle...there is only a switch that has been closed. Now, how would you figure out the potential between R3 and R4. Also, the current is DC from a Battery.
 
Last edited:
To work out the voltage across across a capacitor in series with a resistor you draw a right angled triangle with , voltage across the resistor as the horizontal side and voltage across the capacitor along the vertical side, (usually downwards for capacitors) and total voltage across the hypotenuse.

Assume 100 volts across the series combination.
Take some random values for the capacitors and resistors.
C1 300 ohms reactance
C2 450 ohms reactance
R3 270 ohms
R4 120 ohms

First, the left series combination:
Impedance = sqrt ( 300 *300 + 270 * 270) =403.6 ohms
Current = 100 / 403.6 = 0.247 A
Voltage across resistor = 270 * 0.247 = 66.9 V
Voltage across capacitor = 300 * 0.247 = 74.1 Volts
Angle = tan-1(74.1 / 66.9) =-47.88 deg

Next, the right series combination:
Impedance = sqrt ( 450 *450 + 120 * 120) =465.7 ohms
Current = 100 / 465.7 = 0.215 A
Voltage across resistor =120 * 0.215 = 25.8 V
Voltage across capacitor = 450 * 0.215= 96.75 Volts
Angle = tan-1(96.75 / 25.8) = -75.06 degYou can't subtract these voltages because they are at different phase angles.
so:
Current in R3 is 0.247 A at +47.88 degrees relative to applied voltage.
Voltage across R3 is (270 * .247) at +47.88 degrees =66.69 V at +47.75 deg relative to applied voltage
Current in R4 is 0.215 A at 75.06 degrees relative to applied voltage
Voltage across R4 is (120 * 0.215) or 11.46 volts at 75.06 degrees relative to applied voltage. Graphing these, I get a voltage of "about 60 volts".

Solving it with trig, I get 56.66 volts

All of this was with the switch open and AC. (did it say that before?)

With the switch closed and DC, it is a lot easier.

The capacitors behave like open circuits at DC so the capacitors are not conducting so there is no current in the resistors, so the voltage across the resistors is zero.
 
Last edited:
You have to find the differential equation of the voltage as a function of time. Use laplace transforms of the capacitance value to find impedance ie 1/cs ohms, then use nodal and mesh analysis to find the function. Inverse transform them back into the time domain then you have the voltage function with time. In this case it would be easier to find the differential function for current. Use product over sum to merge the capacitance value to one value. also add up the other resistances. This becomes a simple diff eq if it is a DC source or an AC source. If it is a DC source the current approaches zero as a function of time, therefore at steady state all of the current will travel through the resistors.
 
Last edited:
With the switch closed and a DC supply, this just becomes two parallel resistors charging two parallel capacitors.

After the charging is finished (depending on the time constant), all the supply voltage will be across the two capacitors in parallel.
 
thank you for your help people! GREAT IDEAS!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K