A body intermediate to stars and galaxies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formation of the largest stars and smallest galaxies from primordial hydrogen. It suggests that the largest stars, exceeding 200 solar masses, were abundant but have long since exploded as supernovae. These early supernovae are crucial for explaining cosmic reionization and the creation of black hole seeds for quasars. The earliest structures, likely globular clusters, played a significant role in galaxy formation, with the Jeans mass influencing the collapse of protogalactic clouds. Ultimately, the formation of massive bodies is limited by isothermal collapse and subsequent fragmentation into smaller clouds, halting further growth.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Out of the primordial hydrogen, what were the largest star and smallest galaxy that eventually formed?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Who can say? According to the BB model, the largest star formed from primordial materials (it is assumed that the BB created more than just Hydrogen, by the way) is LONG since gone, and the smallest galaxy ( if it still exists) is undetectable due to low luminosity.
 
Enormous primordial stars [>200 solar masses] are thought to have been very abundant. Large numbers of early supernova are needed to explain reionization, primordial metallicity and create the black hole seeds responsible for quasars. These behemoths would only last around 100 million years before detonating. The earliest large structures were probably globular clusters. They apparently play a role in galaxy formation.
 
Apart from these big primordial population III stars, I do not see how larger objects could actually have formed. Immediately after decoupling, the Jeans mass is about 105 solar masses (the mass of globular clusters, as Chronos mentioned). This structures will be the first protogalactic clouds, which will merge and cluster. However, the formation of a massive body (assuming you had that in mind) on such a scale is actually not possible, since it takes place isothermal collapse of the cloud, which leads the Jeans mass to decrease (density increase), and produces fragmentation into smaller clouds. When the cooling of the cloud is not longer possible, the temperature does not longer remain constant and this process is stopped, leading to the formation of stars.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top