A Brief Question about the Universal constant G

  • Thread starter Thread starter Curious123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Universal
AI Thread Summary
Increasing the universal gravitational constant G would enhance the gravitational force exerted by the sun on Earth, altering its orbit from circular to elliptical, with the closest point (perigee) moving nearer to the sun. This change would also affect individuals on Earth's surface, resulting in a stronger gravitational pull without altering their mass. The concept of a larger G raises concerns about gravitational potential energy, as it would imply an increase in energy, conflicting with the principle of energy conservation. Overall, while the effects of a larger G are theoretically interesting, they pose significant challenges to established physical laws. Understanding these implications is crucial for grasping the dynamics of gravity and celestial mechanics.
Curious123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. This only relates to a homework assignment, my curiosity lies in the effects of increasing the magnitude of G. Would this affect the Earth's orbiting of the sun? I assume that individuals an objects would experience gravity differently but I do not understand how specifically. Would their actual mass increase? Any information about basic effects would be appreciated. Thank you.



2. G=(6.67428+-0.00067)x10^-11m^3kg^-1s^-2
F=G(m1xm2/r^2)




The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Curious.
Interesting question! If G grew larger, then the force of the sun on the Earth would increase according to the formula F = GMm/d2. The Earth's speed would no longer be sufficient to maintain a circular orbit. It would be pulled closer to the sun as it goes around, and would form an elliptical orbit with perigee closer to the sun.

The same argument applies to persons on the surface of the Earth. The same formula shows an increased force of gravity even though the mass of the Earth and the mass of the person remains the same.

I think the idea of increasing G has been toyed with before, but there is a big difficulty with it. As G gets bigger, the gravitational potential energy of all objects under the influence of gravity increases. We are pretty sure energy is conserved, so any theory that indicates increasing energy is probably wrong.
 
thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top