A bullet falling to earth and g being the only pull

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of a bullet shot vertically into the air at 400 m/s and its subsequent fall back to the ground, focusing on the effects of gravity and the calculations related to time and speed during its ascent and descent. Participants explore the implications of gravitational acceleration, average speed, and the equations governing motion, while also addressing common misconceptions about speed and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the bullet will reach the ground at the same speed it was fired, while others challenge this by discussing the effects of gravity and average speed during ascent.
  • One participant calculates the maximum height reached by the bullet using the formula h = u² / 2g, leading to a discussion about the correctness of this approach.
  • There is a claim that the bullet takes approximately 40.77 seconds to reach the ground, which is debated with corrections regarding the time taken to reach maximum altitude and the average speed during the bullet's flight.
  • Participants clarify that 9.81 m/s is the acceleration due to gravity, not a constant speed, and discuss the implications of this on the bullet's motion.
  • Some participants mention that the average speed of the bullet during its ascent is 200 m/s, which is half of the initial speed, affecting the time calculations.
  • There is a mention of air resistance and its effect on real bullets, suggesting that theoretical calculations may not hold in practical scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of understanding the difference between speed and acceleration, but multiple competing views remain regarding the calculations and implications of the bullet's motion, particularly concerning the effects of air resistance and the accuracy of the equations used.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations presented rely on assumptions such as neglecting air resistance, which may not hold true in real-world scenarios. The discussion also highlights potential misunderstandings about the application of kinematic equations.

Sairen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm sure this topic has come up before, however, it was always under the requirements of being realistic, i.e. taking drag, air resistance, Earth rotation and what not into account. Also, I couldn't find any equations so that I can do the math myself. Hence, here is my question:

Suppose I shoot a bullet at 400m/s vertically into the air, I keep reading that it would arrive on the ground at the same speed. Now, I am a really not good at math, but I "know" that under the gravitational force of the earth, any object falls (counting air density, resistance, rotation, etc. out) at the speed of 9,81m/s.

I find it hard to imagine that, knowing this, a bullet would accelerate to its initial speed. So, I wanted to calculate it myself. Here comes the math:

I figured, if the bullet has a speed of 400m/s, then gravity would stop the bullet after aprx. 8154,94m (h = u² / 2g). Knowing its speed, that would mean it would take the bullet 20,39 seconds.

If the bullet arrives at the ground with the same speed, shouldn't it also arrive within the same time frame? I calculated that it will actually take the bullet 40,77 seconds to reach ground (t = √(2d/g)).

That means that the speed of the bullet is actually 199,98 m/s (v = ½ ⁎ g ⁎ d), so half as fast.

m=meters
s=seconds
h=height
u=initial velocity
g=gravitation
d=distance
v=velocity

Now, I am sure I made a super obvious mistake here, probably using the wrong equation or a simple, logical mistake.

Would anybody please be so kind and point it out to me and, if possible, provide with a correct trail of though/math so that I don't have to send the university of illinois physics department an email? :)

Thanx so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sairen said:
I figured, if the bullet has a speed of 400m/s, then gravity would stop the bullet after aprx. 8154,94m (h = u² / 2g). Knowing its speed, that would mean it would take the bullet 20,39 seconds.
The time isn't right, although the height is. If the bullet starts out at 400 m/sec, and gravity is slowing it by 9.8 m/sec every second, it stops after about 40 seconds at a height of about 8000 meters. I suspect that you forgot that the average speed of the bullet is 200 m/sec, not 400 m/sec.

If the bullet arrives at the ground with the same speed, shouldn't it also arrive within the same time frame? I calculated that it will actually take the bullet 40,77 seconds to reach ground (t = √(2d/g))

That means that the speed of the bullet is actually 199,98 m/s (v = ½ ⁎ g ⁎ d), so half as fast.

Now you have the time right, but your calculation of the speed is wrong. Instead, you can use the much simpler ##v=at## which relates speed to time spent accelerating.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to PhysicsForums, Sairen!

You made two mistakes in your calculations. Here's the first one:
Sairen said:
Knowing its speed, that would mean it would take the bullet 20,39 seconds.
You didn't show us how you arrived at that figure, but it's wrong. It takes the bullet 40.77 seconds to reach that maximum altitude, the same amount of time as it takes to fall from that altitude.

That means that the speed of the bullet is actually 199,98 m/s (v = ½ ⁎ g ⁎ d), so half as fast.
And that's the other. You apparently used ##v=\sqrt{gd/2}##. You should have used ##v=\sqrt{2gd}##.
 
Sairen said:
I "know" that under the gravitational force of the earth, any object falls (counting air density, resistance, rotation, etc. out) at the speed of 9,81m/s.

This is not correct. 9.81 is not a speed in metres per second, it is the acceleration due to gravity i.e. the rate of change in speed - each second the speed of a free falling object changes by 9.81 meters per second, so we say the acceleration is 9.81 metres per second per second or 9.81 ms-2 (or m/s2).

Sairen said:
I figured, if the bullet has a speed of 400m/s, then gravity would stop the bullet after aprx. 8154,94m (h = u² / 2g).

This is correct, although I wonder where you got the formula h = u² / 2g from?

Sairen said:
Knowing its speed, that would mean it would take the bullet 20,39 seconds.

You have assumed the bullet is traveling at a constant speed of 400 m/s, but we know that the speed is not constant because when the bullet stops its speed is 0. In fact the speed decreases at a constant rate (of 9.81 ms-2) so its average speed is 200 m/s. It therefore takes the bullet twice the time you have calculated to travel this distance.

Sairen said:
If the bullet arrives at the ground with the same speed, shouldn't it also arrive within the same time frame? I calculated that it will actually take the bullet 40,77 seconds to reach ground (t = √(2d/g)).

This is correct, and is the same as the correct ascent time.

Sairen said:
That means that the speed of the bullet is actually 199,98 m/s (v = ½ ⁎ g ⁎ d), so half as fast.

Again this is the average speed; the final speed is twice this i.e. 400 m/s.
 
Sairen said:
Now, I am a really not good at math, but I "know" that under the gravitational force of the earth, any object falls (counting air density, resistance, rotation, etc. out) at the speed of 9,81m/s.

This is one of the things you 'know' that just ain't so:

Objects falling under the influence of gravity don't travel at a speed of 9.81 m/s. They accelerate at 9.81 m/s^2, which means if you drop something, after the first second, it reaches a velocity of v = at or 9.81 m/s, after two seconds, v = 19.62 m/s, and so on, neglecting air drag, etc.
 
Nugatory said:
I suspect that you forgot that the average speed of the bullet is 200 m/sec, not 400 m/sec.

Nugatory, totally! Didn't see that..


D H said:
Welcome to PhysicsForums, Sairen!

You didn't show us how you arrived at that figure, but it's wrong.

Thanks D H! As for the calculation: I simply calculated 8154,94 / 400 = 20,39.


MrAnchovy said:
This is correct, although I wonder where you got the formula h = u² / 2g from?

MrAnchovy, I got the formula from here :shy:


SteamKing said:
This is one of the things you 'know' that just ain't so

SteamKing, I thought so. Hence, I put my "knowledge" in quotation marks :thumbs:



Thanks to all of you for the swift answers! It's all clear now :!)
 
Last edited:
Sairen said:
Thanks D H! As for the calculation: I simply calculated 8154,94 / 400 = 20,39.
This only works if the average speed was 400m/s. (Or if it was always 400m/s, which amounts to the same thing.) The bullet, however, slows down on the way up, and in fact, the average speed is going to be 200m/s. (This is true for any constant deceleration.) So time in flight is going to be twice what you computed, matching time you (correctly) computed for the bullet falling down.

Of course, all of this assumes no air resistance. Real bullets never fall at the speed they were fired due to air resistance. So it's not something you can test with a bullet. But a steel bearing thrown or fired out of a small spring-loaded cannon vertically up is affected by air resistance very little, so you can test it out and it does work. It falls down at the same speed that it was thrown/fired at.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K