A certain finite group is of order 10

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysKid24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Group
PhysKid24
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi, this problem has been giving me difficulty. A certain finite group is of order 10. Does it have a 3-dimensional irreducible representation? Why or why not? Does anyone know?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are several results that imply it cannot have an irreducilbe 3-d representation (over C). The most far reaching is that the order of every simple (irreducible) representation divides the order of the group. This is a hard theorem to prove, so yuo should avoid relying on it, though it is very powerful.

A simpler result, and an obvious one if you know a little character theory, is that the sum of the squares of the irreducible representations' dimensions is the order of the group.

Now, this group has at least three conjugacy classes, right, since the identity, some element of order 2 and some element of order 5 all exist and are not conjugate, so there are at least 3 irred reps.

If we suppose there is a 3-d one, plus the obvious trivial rep, then 1+9=10 already, so there can't be a thrid one which we know must exist. Thus there is no irred rep of dimension 3.
 
But how do you know what the conjugacy classes are, and what do you mean they are not conjugate? So 1^2 + 3^2+3^2 = 10, which is the order of the group, and tells me I have 3 irreducible reps, but what is meant by 3-dimensional? Thanks a lot
 
Last edited:
1+3^2+3^2=19, not 10.

There are at least 3 conjugacy classes. You know what a conjugacy class is? Elements in the same conjugacy class have the same order, thus the elements in the sylow 2 subgrops and the sylow 5 subgroups cannot be conjugate, and only the identity is conjugate to the identity, thus there are at least 3 conjugacy classes, and hence at least 3 irreducible representations.

3 dimensional refers the the representation.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top