A charged particle entering a magnetic field at an angle -- is work done?

AI Thread Summary
A charged particle, such as an electron, does not gain energy when entering a magnetic field, regardless of the angle, because the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the particle's velocity. This means that the work done by the magnetic field is zero, as indicated by the equation P = v · F = 0. Even when entering at an angle, the magnetic force remains perpendicular, maintaining the particle's kinetic energy. The discussion draws a parallel to centripetal motion, where a constant speed indicates no change in energy despite a change in direction. Therefore, a purely magnetic field does not do work on charged particles.
big_bounce
Messages
102
Reaction score
3
Hello PF's members

I know a magnetic field doesn't work on charged particles if magnetic field being perpendicular to the velocity of the particles. also i know magnetic field doesn't work if a charged particle enters with right angle into the field.

But suppose that a charged particle like electron is entering with angel 35 degree at a uniform magnetic field.
Does magnetic field work on charged particle after entering and electron gains energy? what about when magnetic field is non-uniform?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A purely magnetic field never does work on the charged particle since the force is always perpendicular to the velocity,
$$\vec{F}_{\text{mag}}=\frac{q}{c} \vec{v} \times \vec{B} \; \Rightarrow \; P=\vec{v} \cdot \vec{F}=0.$$
 
  • Like
Likes big_bounce
vanhees71 said:
A purely magnetic field never does work on the charged particle since the force is always perpendicular to the velocity,
$$\vec{F}_{\text{mag}}=\frac{q}{c} \vec{v} \times \vec{B} \; \Rightarrow \; P=\vec{v} \cdot \vec{F}=0.$$

EVEN If the electron enters the field at an angle to the field direction, magnetic force remains perpendicular to the velocity?
 
Yes, the force is always perpendicular to both the field and the velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes big_bounce
therefore for changing motion of object in direction we always don't have to expend (or gain) energy?
 
big_bounce said:
therefore for changing motion of object in direction we always don't have to expend (or gain) energy?

Think of a simple case of centripetal motion at some constant potential energy state (perhaps a "car" going around a circular, horizontal track at constant speed). The centripetal force is responsible for the change in motion, but that doesn't mean the energy changes (constant speed means constant kinetic energy).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top