What Happens to a Comet's Orbit at Aphelion with Decreasing Angular Momentum?

AI Thread Summary
As the angular momentum of a comet decreases toward zero while maintaining a fixed aphelion distance, the eccentricity of its orbit approaches 1, indicating a transition to a parabolic trajectory. The distance of closest approach, or perihelion, also approaches zero in this limit. This scenario suggests that the comet's orbital velocity diminishes, leading it to move directly toward the sun. The equations provided illustrate the relationship between angular momentum, eccentricity, and the distances of aphelion and perihelion. Ultimately, the comet's behavior indicates a shift from an elliptical to a hyperbolic trajectory as angular momentum decreases.
kala
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a comet which passes through its aphelion at a distance rmax from the sun. Imagine that, keeping rmax fixed, we somehow make the angular momentum l smaller and smaller though not actually zero; that is we let l\rightarrow0. Use equations c=l2/\gamma\ mu and rmax=c/1-\epsilon, rmin=1+\epsilonto show that in this limit the eccentricity, \epsilon of the elliptical orbit approaches 1 and the distance of closest approach rmin approaches zero.

Homework Equations



the equations posted above look funny, but for c it should be c=l2/gamma*mu
rmax=c/1-epsilon and rmin= c/1+epsilon.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I know that I am going to need to take limits. what i tried was to substitute in the c for the rmax equation, but then i really didn't know where to go from there. any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, physically what happened if you too l--> 0 What you reall did is take your orbital velocity to zero.

L = mV X R

You assumed aphelion, so R was fixed. Assuming mass went to zero would just make the commet float away. What wil happen is the commet will make a b-line straight for the sun.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top