A concept question got deleted

  • Thread starter Thread starter dramadeur
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A user expressed frustration over their question regarding a formula being deleted by a moderator, who deemed it a homework question. The user argued that their inquiry was conceptual, lacking specific values, and should not fall under homework guidelines. They highlighted inconsistencies in moderation, pointing out similar threads that were allowed despite resembling homework inquiries. The discussion emphasized the need for clearer rules regarding conceptual questions and the use of visual aids in forum posts. The user seeks clarification from other moderators on the interpretation of the rules.
dramadeur
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Greetings,
in this link there's a picture of a slide
I posted it in a thread in which I asked a question, but it got deleted by "Nugatory", because he thought it was a "hw question".

My question was regarding the formula on the right "v0x = v * d/(sqrt(d^2 + (h-y0)^2)", asking where the formula comes from.
Plus, there are no values in this slide, so you'd only find a general solution, not specific one. I say, it's a concept problem.
It seems that the mod who deleted my thread misplaced his judgement.

I won't rest until I hear from other mods that they honestly believe this was a homework question. Come on, look me in the eye and tell me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't matter if it is actual homework as long as it can be handled as homework, (is asking an explanation for a question).. His decision was correct. I see you haven't bothered to read our rules, which explain this.
 
From the rules (https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/physics-forums-global-guidelines.414380/ under Homework Guidelines):
Any and all high school and undergraduate homework assignments or textbook style exercises for which you are seeking assistance are to be posted in the appropriate forum in our Homework & Coursework Questions area--not in blogs, visitor messages, PMs, or the main technical forums. This should be done whether the problem is part of one's assigned coursework or just independent study.
I concur with Nugatory's decision.
 
Evo said:
It doesn't matter if it is actual homework as long as it can be handled as homework, (is asking an explanation for a question).
Do you realize I'd easily scoop out threads that are similar or can be easily be subject to deletion according to what you've just said? Just to name a few from the recent ones:
Joule-Thomson-Coefficient (JTC)
OP asks for values to plug in into variables in the formulas posted.Linear Expansion
OP asks for "the procedure to solve this problem", whereas I, inquired about an existing one (e.g. why is there "(h-y0)" in the formula), because I wanted to understand how it came to be.

Why is the answer to this question "No change"
While the OP asks why the answer is the answer, I merely inquired why a certain formula in the slide is the formula.

Also, here
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/confused-about-kinetic-energy.795203/
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/calculate-angle-as-a-function-of-time.795957/

the OPs ask about formulas one way or another, that's what I did too, I saw a formula, and I wanted to get an explanation as to why it looks the way it looks like. Except, I provided a picture and context for better understanding about the formula. Did I need to simply rephrase what the slide said? I bet if I only posted a text, there wouldn't have been a problem. I also wager, if I you didn't see the slide, you wouldn't be able to say that it come from a "textbook styl
So is that it? I was supposed to sacrifice the visuals in order to make the question appear less like a hw?

Should I have asked then:
"You know, there is a formula to calculate horizontal and vertical velocities of a dart that had been fired from a gun at a monkey at height h,
here it is:
"v0x = v * d/(d^2 + (h-y0)^2)

And I just don't get, where does h-y0 come from? Or what was used to construct this formula? Can someone back it up a few steps?"

But such a thread wouldn't have been as clear as with the attached screenshot of a slide.btw,
Radiant intensity, LED specifications
This one is a bit different, though, since OP has already found the answer, but is confused about it.
So does it mean, that if I find a legit answer using correct formulas I might inquire about it in the general physics sub-forum?
Something similar happened in my case as well, only I wanted to know more about the formula that helps to get the final answer.
Mark44 said:
From the rules (https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/physics-forums-global-guidelines.414380/ under Homework Guidelines):
or textbook style exercises
The discussion problem didn't come from a textbook. So I'd suggest to specifically list the sources, data from which cannot be inquired about in any sense.
Note again these ones: 1, 2
Formulas in here could only come from "textbook style exercises".

So again, if I only mentioned horizontal velocity, omitting the slide, you wouldn't be able to say it comes from an exercise/problem. Besides, even if you go to Physics topics like this one. There is almost always an example/problem after the explanation of a concept.

Does it mean you shouldn't reference such examples if you have question about a concept?
 
Last edited:
You have easily spent 10x as much effort writing that last post as it would have taken to simply post your question in the right section using the template.
 
  • Like
Likes StevieTNZ
"They got away with it, why can't I?"
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top