A couple basic conceptual questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter haydn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual Couple
AI Thread Summary
In Case A, the torque is zero because the forces from the ribbon and friction cancel each other out, leading to no net torque. The equation for torque, t = rFsinθ, results in zero when the net force is zero. In Case B, there are two force components, but the net torque is still calculated as rF due to their perpendicular arrangement. The discussion emphasizes the importance of free body diagrams to visualize forces and torques acting on the system. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing the mechanics involved.
haydn
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Question 1:
labdiagram1.jpg


I was told here that in Case A, the torque is equal to zero. I'm not really seeing that. I know torque is equal to rFsin\theta. If I draw a vector from the rotation point (the very center of the spool) to the point where the force is being applied, I get that the force and r are perpendicular, so sin\theta=1. Where am I going wrong? I was told that the torque in case B is rF, which I can clearly see by the same reasoning.

Question 2:
labdiagram2.jpg


For both cases, I was told the net force and net torque on the system is 0. The system is considered to be both of the objects. If someone could explain this I'd appreciate it.


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"net"

haydn said:
I was told here that in Case A, the torque is equal to zero. I'm not really seeing that.

For both cases, I was told the net force and net torque on the system is 0. The system is considered to be both of the objects. If someone could explain this I'd appreciate it.

Hi haydn! :smile:

(i'm assuming that the friction is preventing the spool from moving)

If the spool isn't moving, then yes the net torque is zero.

The net torque is the sum of the torque from the ribbon and the torque (or moment … same thing :biggrin:) from the friction force (and, technically the torque of the weight also, though if you take torque about the centre, then that will be zero :wink:)

Question 2 is similar … you use the net force or torque, which means adding all the forces or torques. :smile:
 
Thanks for the reply. I'm not sure I'm understanding your explanation completely. Please tell me if I'm right or wrong here.

For my first question, in case A, the net torque is 0 because the friction force and the force applied via the ribbon cancel each other out. So incorporating the equation t=rFsin\theta, you would plug the net force, 0 into the equation?

Then for case B on the second question though, there are two force components, friction and the force applied via the ribbon... wouldn't this result in a net force at some angle other than 90 degrees? I was told thought that for case B, torque is just equal to rF.

Thanks for the help.
 
I'm really not following what you're doing.

The question quite clearly tells you to start by drawing "an extended free body diagram for each case".

Have you done this? What does it show? What equations can you get from it?
 
Yes I drew free body diagrams. For case A I have a force going to the right via the ribbon and a friction force going to the left. I believe these cancel out for a net force of 0.

For case B I have a force going straight up via the ribbon and a friction force perpendicular to that, going to the left along the table. I don't get how the net torque in this case is equal to rF.
 
haydn said:
Yes I drew free body diagrams.

No you didn't …

what about the other forces?​
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top