A Cubic Function and a Straight Line with One-variable Calculus

seniorhs9
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi. I posted this in the Homework question but after 152 views with no right answer, my question looks analytical and rigorous enough to be posted here.

Thank you...

----

I am asking about part iv).

[PLAIN]http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/7977/113ivb.jpg

Attempt at a solution

In the given fact, I think x^3 - x - m(x - a) distance from the cubic function to the line. So for every point in (b, c), this would be negative.

I'm really not sure how to show c = -2b so I just tried to play with some algebra...

At x = b... b^3 - b - m(b - a) = 0

At x = c... c^3 - c - m(c - a) = 0

So they're both equal to 0...


b^3 - b - m(b - a) = c^3 - c - m(c - a)

so b^3 - b - mb = c^3 - c - mc

so by part i) b^3 - b - b(3b^2 - 1) = c^3 - c - c(3b^2 - 1)

so b^3 - b - 3b^3 + b = c^3 - c - 3b^2c + c

so -2b^3 = c^3 - 3b^2c

so b^2(3c - 2b) = c^3

but this doesn't look useful...

Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
FOR PART 4:
You just expand RHS of give eq. in and equate coefficients of x^2 on both sides and you'll get it.
 
Hi omkar13. Thanks so much for your answer.

Now I feel like an idiot...how did you see to expand the RHS of the given eq.?

Somehow I didn't see it...I thought there was something harder going on...
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...

Similar threads

Back
Top