A cylinder full of water on a scale

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nargesh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder Scale Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Heating a cylinder full of water on a scale does not change the weight displayed by the scale, assuming no water evaporates. While heating introduces energy into the system, which can be considered a form of mass, the amount of energy required to produce a measurable weight change is substantial. The expansion of the heated cylinder may cause slight buoyancy effects, potentially making it appear "lighter," but these changes are negligible. Overall, the weight remains constant, disregarding any relativistic effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the concept of buoyancy
  • Knowledge of energy-mass equivalence
  • Basic principles of convection
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of thermodynamics in closed systems
  • Explore buoyancy effects in heated liquids
  • Study energy-mass equivalence as described by Einstein's theory
  • Investigate convection currents and their impact on surrounding environments
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of thermodynamics and fluid dynamics.

nargesh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
if we have cylinder full of water on a scale the we heat it, does the scale show any difference in weight of cylinder? water don't evaporate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say no. Heating a liquid does introduce energy into the cylinder and energy is really a form of mass (and the other way around), but you'd need a lot of energy to see it on a scale. And I mean a lot of energy.
 
The heated cylinder would expand, which due to buoyancy might cause it to be a little bit "lighter" according to the scale. You'd probably need a hell of a scale to pick this up.

There would be movement of air around the cylinder due to convection. I suppose that could also be picked up depending on the scale.

In any case, the actual weight of the cylinder would be unchanged neglecting relativistic effects.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 206 ·
7
Replies
206
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K