A cylinder of electric field varying in time

AI Thread Summary
An infinite cylinder with a time-varying electric field is analyzed to determine the current in a rectangular wire placed outside the cylinder. The discussion highlights the challenge of applying Maxwell's equations, particularly the fourth equation, since the varying electric field exists only within the cylinder. To find the magnetic field outside the cylinder, users suggest using Ampere's Law with the displacement current, noting that the displacement current is zero in empty space. The conversation emphasizes the importance of evaluating the flux of the time-variant electric field and using Stoke's theorem to derive the magnetic field. Ultimately, the magnetic field outside the cylinder is confirmed to be tangential, simplifying the path integral evaluation.
alle.fabbri
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have this problem:
In empty space there is an infinite cylinder, with its axis parallel to z axis and radius a, filled with an eletric field of equation
\vec{E}(t) = E_0 e^{\beta t} \hat{z}
Now I put a rectangular wire on the plane yz out of the cylinder of side l and b (l lies on the y axis) and the question is: which is the current on the wire?

I try to attack the problem in the straightforward way. So I try to solve Maxwell's fourth equation
\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B} = \frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{E}
and initially I thought that I had to compute the flux through the wire of the varying magnetic field I get...but I realize that this is impossible because this equation is only valid inside the cylinder, where I have a varying electric field, and not outside where there is only empty space!

Could anyone help...please?!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Ampere's law (with the displacement current) to get B(t) outside the cylinder.
 
What do you mean with Amperè's Law?? Maybe the fourth Maxwell's Equation?? This one?
\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B} = \mu_0 \vec{J} + \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}
And if I do?? The displacement current is zero outside the cylinder...
 
Using Stoke's theorem, you can derive Ampere's law:
\oint{\bf dr}\cdot{\bf B}=\frac{1}{c^2}\int{\bf dS}\cdot\partial_t{\bf E}.
 
Ok...I get what you mean. So I choose a cylinder of radius r>a and height z, evaluate the flux of \frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t} and thanks to Ampere's Law this is equal to the path integral of B over a circle of radius r in the at height z parallel to xy plane. May I say that B is always tangential so the path integral is easy to evaluate?? If yes why?? I thought in analogy with the magnetic field generated by a wire...

Thank you

Ciao!
 
It is just like a wire, but it doesn't matter.
For the loop you have only B tangential enters the flux.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top