A doubt on self inductance and mutual inductance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concepts of self-inductance and mutual inductance in coils. It clarifies that a change in flux in the primary coil induces an electromotive force (emf) in the secondary coil due to mutual inductance, while self-inductance accounts for the induced voltage in the primary coil itself. Both self-induction and mutual induction can occur simultaneously when the coils are in close proximity. The dialogue emphasizes that self-induction is always present, regardless of the interaction with another coil. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the behavior of inductive components in electrical circuits.
ayush123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i am having a doubt that when we find a expression for mutual inductance we say that flux change in primary coil induces emf in secondary coil. but why change in flux doesn't induce any current in primary coil also.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ayush123 said:
i am having a doubt that when we find a expression for mutual inductance we say that flux change in primary coil induces emf in secondary coil. but why change in flux doesn't induce any current in primary coil also.

Who said it doesn't? It does. The voltage induced in the coil due to it's own flux is accounted for by it's self indictance while the voltage induced in another coil due to flux in the first is due to the mutual inductance.
 
u mean that when both the primary and secondary coils are at close proximity then along with mutual induction self induction also occurs. am i right.
 
Self-induction always occurs. Mutual induction occurs when components are brought in close enough proximity to allow coupling.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top