A Doubt Regarding Quantization of charge ,its relevance in integration

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of charge quantization and its implications for integration in physics, particularly in the context of calculating potential energy and handling distributions of charge. Participants explore the justification for using infinitesimal charge elements in integrals despite the fundamental quantization of charge.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to justify the use of infinitesimal charge elements ('dq') in integration, given that the smallest charge is 'e' and fractional charges do not exist.
  • Another participant suggests that in a system with a very large number of charges (N → ∞), the system can be treated as continuous, allowing for the use of integrals instead of sums, with negligible error due to charge discreteness.
  • A similar point is reiterated about the approximation of treating an additional charge as infinitesimal when N is large, emphasizing that the error diminishes as N increases.
  • There is a request for further discussion on the concept of 'dq' charge, indicating a desire for deeper exploration of this topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approximation of treating large systems of charges as continuous for integration purposes, but there is no consensus on the implications of charge quantization for integration methods.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations regarding the assumptions made when transitioning from discrete to continuous models, particularly in the context of charge quantization and the mathematical treatment of infinitesimals.

Uday
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
a) We know that the smallest charge that can exist is 'e' . But in several instances (such as calculating potential energy of sphere of charge ) we consider 'dq' and then integrate it . How can we justify this ?

b) We know that 1/2 or 1/3 of e (charge of electron) doesn't exist . But integration is a process in which we add every fraction in the limits of integration which should be an error in the case of integration of charges . So should we use a different method for adding up ( in uniform distribution of charges ) ?
PLZ HELP ... and thanks for spending ur valuable time reading this ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we have a system consisting of ##N \rightarrow \infty ## charges then we can treat the system as continuous to an extremely good approximation and perform integrals instead of extremely large sums. The error in the integral due to the discreteness of charge will be vanishingly small as ##N \rightarrow \infty ##. If you've taken statistical mechanics then you most likely used this approximation method over and over when calculating partition functions for various systems with many degrees of freedom. We're doing the same thing here.
 
WannabeNewton said:
If we have a system consisting of ##N \rightarrow \infty ## charges then we can treat the system as continuous to an extremely good approximation and perform integrals instead of extremely large sums. The error in the integral due to the discreteness of charge will be vanishingly small as ##N \rightarrow \infty ##. If you've taken statistical mechanics then you most likely used this approximation method over and over when calculating partition functions for various systems with many degrees of freedom. We're doing the same thing here.

can we talk about dq charge?
 
Consider a system of ##N## charges, all of charge ##q##, such that ##N \gg 1##. If I add another charge ##q## to this collection then the new total charge will just be ##Q = q(N + 1)## but ##N \gg 1## so compared to ##qN## the new charge ##q## is so small, i.e. ##q \ll qN##, that we can just treat ##q## as an infinitesimal amount of charge ##dq## and the error in this approximation will get smaller and smaller as ##N \rightarrow \infty##.

So physically no there isn't ##dq## amount of a charge but if we have ##N \rightarrow \infty## amount of charges in a system then adding a new charge ##q## will add such a fantanstically small amount of charge to the total charge of the system that we may as well treat ##q## as an infinitesimal ##dq## and use integration, which is computationally much simpler to work with than sums of Coulomb forces between an extremely large number of charges.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
951
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K