A few general Qs about momentum and springs.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between momentum, force, and mass, specifically addressing the equation f = dp/dt and its implications when mass is not constant. It explains that when mass varies, the equation expands to f = m(dv/dt) + v(dm/dt), highlighting the complexity of the system. Participants also seek clarification on important spring equations beyond f = -kx and e = 0.5kx^2, discussing energy work equations related to springs. The conversation concludes with an example involving a car losing mass and the challenges of integrating the changing variables in the context of force and momentum.
merper
if p is momentum then dp/dt = f right?

I've heard that dp/dt can be written as f = m(dv/dt) + v(dm/dt)

Can someone tell me what this actually means, because it would seem that m would be dependent on v and v dependent on m, so I am not sure how this would work out.


Also, can someone point tell me some important equations for springs other than f= -kx and e = .5kx^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"The time rate of change of the momentum of a particle is equal to the net force acting on the particle and is in the direction of that force" (quoted from Halliday, Resnick, Walker. "The Fundamentals of Physics", 6th ed. 2001)
That is what they used to explain F(net)= dp/dt
As far as, f = m(dv/dt) + v(dm/dt), I'm not sure.

Somemore spring equations for ya:

Work = (1/2)k*(x(initial)^2)-(1/2)k*(x(final)^2)
Work = (1/2)k*(x^2) (work by a spring force with (x initial being 0))

You can use work equations from above to solve different problems associated with energy in the system:

K(final) - K(initial) = Work (k = (1/2)m*(v^2), of course

Hope this helps.
 
I hope that the following will help you.

You have the equation f=dp/dt, but we know that p=mv so: f=d(mv)/dt.

When m is constant then we have the famous f=mdv/dt we were using at school for years (a=dv/dt), but what happened when m is not constant. When m is not constant the derivative d(mv)/dt is equal to: f=m(dv/dt)+(dm/dt)v which is the full type of the second law of Newton.
 
Last edited:
For the springs, how does one determine the period. Is there not a cosW somewhere?


alright, i can see how u get the mv equation as a result of the chain rule, but I'm still not sure exactly how it applies. Here's one of the examples my TA used to try and explain this.

A constant Force, F, is applied to a car with mass M containing within, some sand with mass m. (so mass total is M+m at the start). Concurrently, a hole opens up at the bottom of the car and it starts dropping sand at a rate of dm/dt. Find the speed of the car when all the sand is dropped.

So basically we have F = dm/dt(which we know)v + m(dv/dt)

he also pointed out that Pf - P0 = F (delta)t

and that F =m(dv/dt)

So (delta)t = m/(dm/dt)

After this part i got confused - if dv/dt is changing based on mass and v is changing based on dv/dt, how can I do this. Is this a double integral?
 
Hi!
We have so far that F=m(dv/dt)+v(dm/dt) now multiply the last equation with dt (I know the mathematicians will loose their hair with this but as you know this work very well in physics) and you will get:
Fdt=mdv+vdm and here is where you have the problem, divide with dm and you certainly will fell better when you see that:
F(dt/dm)=m(dv/dm)+v . We know that dm/dt is constant so we can write dm/dt=-c (the - is because the mass of the sand is reducing). So we have:
–F/c=m(dv/dm)+v and -(F/c+v)dm=mdv.
I hope this will help.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top