A first course in Calculus by Lang

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the differences between the first edition and later editions of a calculus textbook, noting that the first edition is significantly shorter, aimed at school children, and focuses on fundamental concepts without rigorous proofs like Epsilon Delta. In contrast, later editions expand the content to cater to university students, increasing the level of detail and complexity, although they remain less rigorous than some theoretical texts. The first edition has been reprinted as "Short Calculus," while those seeking a more theoretical approach are directed to Lang's "Undergraduate Analysis." The newer editions include Epsilon Delta proofs in the appendix. While Strang is recognized as a good teacher, opinions on his book vary, and there are mixed feelings about other textbooks like Thomas/Finney and Leithold Calculus, with some finding them less engaging or more difficult compared to others like "Calculus for Scientists and Engineers" by Briggs and Cochrane.
OceanSpring
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I've noticed that the first edition has 250 some odd pages and I believe the last edition has over 500 pages. Would I be missing out on any material if I bought an earlier edition? I have a limited amount of time so the shorter the text the better.

I also noticed it does not use Epsilon Delta proofs. Most texts make a big deal about the limit setting Calculus apart from all other mathematics so I'm wondering if this is something that should be covered.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first edition was written for school children, around grade 10 or 11 (standard 8/9, or form 4/5). It contains just the fundamentals and bare bones of calculus, just so that school children get the basic ideas and calculations. So it's more like a school textbook. The later editions were expanded to become university textbooks, the level of detail and difficulty also increased; but they are still not rigorous and theoretical, they are more like Stewart's calculus books, although nowhere near as bad. So the recent editions are like a different book from the first one. Actually, the first edition has been reprinted as Short Calculus. If you want a theoretical calculus book then Lang has written Undergraduate Analysis.
 
The new editions do give epsilon-delta proofs in the appendix, I believe.
 
Strang is a good teacher, but I did not like his book. If you want to just learn some calculus, any textbook will be good. There are plenty, but I would not recommend Thomas/Finney. I found that book very dull and boring, or maybe I just did not like the presentation. Right now I'm using Leithold Calculus, but that book has significantly more difficult when compared to the College text I'm using for my class, Calculus for Scientist and Engineers by Briggs, Cochrane.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
16
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top