A first course in Calculus by Lang

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between the first edition of "A First Course in Calculus" by Lang and its later editions. The first edition, aimed at school children, contains approximately 250 pages and focuses on fundamental concepts without rigorous epsilon-delta proofs. In contrast, later editions expand to over 500 pages, catering to university-level students and including more detailed content, although they remain less theoretical than other texts like Stewart's calculus books. For those seeking a rigorous approach, Lang's "Undergraduate Analysis" is recommended.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with epsilon-delta definitions of limits
  • Knowledge of different calculus textbooks and their target audiences
  • Ability to compare educational materials for different academic levels
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between "A First Course in Calculus" and "Short Calculus" by Lang
  • Explore epsilon-delta proofs and their significance in calculus
  • Investigate other calculus textbooks, such as Stewart's and Leithold's, for comparative analysis
  • Examine "Undergraduate Analysis" by Lang for a more theoretical approach to calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students transitioning from high school to university-level calculus, educators selecting appropriate textbooks, and anyone seeking to understand the evolution of calculus teaching materials.

OceanSpring
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I've noticed that the first edition has 250 some odd pages and I believe the last edition has over 500 pages. Would I be missing out on any material if I bought an earlier edition? I have a limited amount of time so the shorter the text the better.

I also noticed it does not use Epsilon Delta proofs. Most texts make a big deal about the limit setting Calculus apart from all other mathematics so I'm wondering if this is something that should be covered.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first edition was written for school children, around grade 10 or 11 (standard 8/9, or form 4/5). It contains just the fundamentals and bare bones of calculus, just so that school children get the basic ideas and calculations. So it's more like a school textbook. The later editions were expanded to become university textbooks, the level of detail and difficulty also increased; but they are still not rigorous and theoretical, they are more like Stewart's calculus books, although nowhere near as bad. So the recent editions are like a different book from the first one. Actually, the first edition has been reprinted as Short Calculus. If you want a theoretical calculus book then Lang has written Undergraduate Analysis.
 
The new editions do give epsilon-delta proofs in the appendix, I believe.
 
Strang is a good teacher, but I did not like his book. If you want to just learn some calculus, any textbook will be good. There are plenty, but I would not recommend Thomas/Finney. I found that book very dull and boring, or maybe I just did not like the presentation. Right now I'm using Leithold Calculus, but that book has significantly more difficult when compared to the College text I'm using for my class, Calculus for Scientist and Engineers by Briggs, Cochrane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K